These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 884173)

  • 1. Attention and cardiac activity: heart rate responses during a variable foreperiod, disjunctive reaction time task.
    Coles MG; Duncan-Johnson CC
    Biol Psychol; 1977 Jun; 5(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 884173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does the heart know what the eye sees? A cardiac/pupillometric analysis of motor preparation and response execution.
    van der Molen MW; Boomsma DI; Jennings JR; Nieuwboer RT
    Psychophysiology; 1989 Jan; 26(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 2922458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cardiac activity and information processing: the effects of stimulus significance, and detection and response requirements.
    Coles MGH; Duncan-Johnson CC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Nov; 1(4):418-428. PubMed ID: 1185127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
    Los SA; Horoufchin H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in resting heart rate and spontaneous electrodermal activity as predictors of attentional processes: effects on anticipatory heart rate deceleration and task performance.
    Zimmer H; Vossel G; Fröhlich WD
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1990 Apr; 8(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 2338405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of foreperiod duration on reflexive and voluntary responses to intense noise bursts.
    Sollers JJ; Hackley SA
    Psychophysiology; 1997 Sep; 34(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 9299906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural modulation by regularity and passage of time.
    Correa A; Nobre AC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1649-55. PubMed ID: 18632896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Within-subject covariation of reaction time and foreperiod cardiac deceleration: effects of respiration and imperative stimulus intensity.
    Iacono WG; Lykken DT
    Biol Psychol; 1978 Dec; 7(4):287-302. PubMed ID: 749938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variable foreperiods and temporal discrimination.
    Grondin S; Rammsayer T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 May; 56(4):731-65. PubMed ID: 12745838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A New Foreperiod Effect on Intertrial Phase Coherence. Part I: Existence and Behavioral Relevance.
    Rapela J; Westerfield M; Townsend J
    Neural Comput; 2018 Sep; 30(9):2348-2383. PubMed ID: 29949462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting variable-foreperiod effects: evaluating the repetition priming account.
    Han T; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1193-1207. PubMed ID: 35391659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional effort modulated by task difficulty.
    Urbach D; Spitzer H
    Vision Res; 1995 Aug; 35(15):2169-77. PubMed ID: 7667929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appearance of two-level CNV and extrication wave and the explanation of psychological factors of CNV.
    Wei JH; Zheng LX
    Int J Neurosci; 1987 Feb; 32(3-4):747-56. PubMed ID: 3596920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distinct effects of trial-driven and task Set-related control in primary visual cortex.
    Griffis JC; Elkhetali AS; Vaden RJ; Visscher KM
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():285-297. PubMed ID: 26163806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of task type and task requirements on the dissociation of skin conductance responses and secondary task probe reaction time.
    Siddle DA; Lipp OV; Dall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 1996 Jan; 33(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 8570797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Warning signals induce automatic EMG activations and proactive volitional inhibition: evidence from analysis of error distribution in simple RT.
    Boulinguez P; Jaffard M; Granjon L; Benraiss A
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 99(3):1572-8. PubMed ID: 18171709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.