BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8841804)

  • 1. Sonographic assessment of cervical changes during pregnancy and delivery: current concepts.
    Maymon R; Shulman A; Ariely S; Halperin R; Caspi E; Weinraub Z
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Aug; 67(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 8841804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sonographic diagnosis of premature cervical dilatation. Potential pitfall due to lower uterine segment contractions.
    Karis JP; Hertzberg BS; Bowie JD
    J Ultrasound Med; 1991 Feb; 10(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 2020054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of ultrasonographically detected cervical changes in response to transfundal pressure, coughing, and standing in predicting cervical incompetence.
    Guzman ER; Pisatowski DM; Vintzileos AM; Benito CW; Hanley ML; Ananth CV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):660-5. PubMed ID: 9322639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sonographic assessment of the cervix in pregnancy.
    Wong G; Levine D
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1998 Aug; 19(4):370-80. PubMed ID: 9718665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can examination of the cervix provide useful information for prediction of cervical incompetence and following preterm labour?
    Rocco BP; Garrone C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 39(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 10554937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks' gestation in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth.
    Guzman ER; Mellon C; Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Walters C; Gipson K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 92(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 9649088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic incompetent cervix uteri. Sonographic observations.
    Parulekar SG; Kiwi R
    J Ultrasound Med; 1988 Sep; 7(9):481-5. PubMed ID: 3054141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnosis of cervical change in pregnancy by means of transvaginal ultrasonography.
    Joffe GM; Del Valle GO; Izquierdo LA; Gilson GJ; Smith JF; Chatterjee MS; Curet LB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 166(3):896-900. PubMed ID: 1550160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between endocervical canal length between 15-24 weeks gestation and obstetric history.
    Guzman ER; Mellon R; Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Walters C; Gipson K
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1998; 7(6):269-72. PubMed ID: 9848691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transvaginal sonographic examination of the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women: review of the literature.
    Rozenberg P; Gillet A; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):302-11. PubMed ID: 11896957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring the effacement of the uterine cervix by transperineal sonography: a new perspective.
    Zilianti M; Azuaga A; Calderon F; Pagés G; Mendoza G
    J Ultrasound Med; 1995 Oct; 14(10):719-24. PubMed ID: 8544236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The implications of sonographically identified cervical changes in patients not necessarily at risk for preterm birth.
    Riley L; Frigoletto FD; Benacerraf BR
    J Ultrasound Med; 1992 Mar; 11(3):75-9. PubMed ID: 1608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Sonographic measurement of cervical length and prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery: how useful is it?].
    Loureiro T; Cunha M; Montenegro N
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(5):395-404. PubMed ID: 17376326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sonography and transfundal pressure in the evaluation of the cervix during pregnancy.
    Guzman ER; Houlihan C; Vintzileos A
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1995 May; 50(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 7617341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sonography in the evaluation of the cervix during pregnancy.
    Guzman ER; Benito C; Hanley M
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Apr; 8(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 8734123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The natural history of a positive response to transfundal pressure in women at risk for cervical incompetence.
    Guzman ER; Vintzileos AM; McLean DA; Martins ME; Benito CW; Hanley ML
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 176(3):634-8. PubMed ID: 9077619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the presence of a funnel increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in a patient with a short cervix?
    Rust OA; Atlas RO; Kimmel S; Roberts WE; Hess LW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1060-6. PubMed ID: 15846180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Role of the cervix uteri at labor onset from ultrasound studies].
    Reinold E; Eppel W; Asseryanis E; Frigo P; Schurz B
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1994; 198(5-6):196-200. PubMed ID: 7717007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physical characteristics of the cervix.
    Conrad JT; Ueland K
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Mar; 26(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 6340893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sonographic assessment of the incompetent cervix during pregnancy.
    Marder SJ; Jackson M
    Semin Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 34(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9988861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.