These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8842053)

  • 1. Serial versus sparse sampling in toxicokinetic studies.
    Tse FL; Nedelman JR
    Pharm Res; 1996 Jul; 13(7):1105-8. PubMed ID: 8842053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative computer simulation study of three different sparse-sampling methods for the estimation of steady-state area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) in toxicokinetics.
    Mahmood I
    J Pharm Sci; 1997 May; 86(5):579-83. PubMed ID: 9145382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of serial cervical or tail blood sampling on toxicity and toxicokinetic evaluation in rats.
    Hattori N; Takumi A; Saito K; Saito Y
    J Toxicol Sci; 2020; 45(10):599-609. PubMed ID: 33012728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinguishing animal subsets in toxicokinetic studies: comparison of non-linear mixed effects modelling with non-compartmental methods.
    Hing JP; Woolfrey SG; Greenslade D; Wright PM
    J Appl Toxicol; 2002; 22(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 12424748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential pharmacokinetics of diclofenac potassium for oral solution vs immediate-release tablets from a randomized trial: effect of fed and fasting conditions.
    Chen C; Bujanover S; Kareht S; Rapoport AM
    Headache; 2015 Feb; 55(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 25546369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bioequivalence evaluation of sparse sampling pharmacokinetics data using bootstrap resampling method.
    Shen M; Machado SG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 27906608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and anatomic pathology effects of serial blood sampling in rat toxicology studies, using conventional or microsampling methods.
    Caron A; Lelong C; Bartels T; Dorchies O; Gury T; Chalier C; Benning V
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Aug; 72(3):429-39. PubMed ID: 26028367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coverage and precision of confidence intervals for area under the curve using parametric and non-parametric methods in a toxicokinetic experimental design.
    Bonate PL
    Pharm Res; 1998 Mar; 15(3):405-10. PubMed ID: 9563069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sparse sampling for assessment of drug exposure in toxicological studies.
    Burtin P; Mentre F; van Bree J; Steimer JL
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 1996; 21(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 8839683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a limited sampling approach in pharmacokinetic studies: experience with the antiepilepsy drug tiagabine.
    Mahmood I
    J Clin Pharmacol; 1998 Apr; 38(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 9590459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying Bailer's method for AUC confidence intervals to sparse sampling.
    Nedelman JR; Gibiansky E; Lau DT
    Pharm Res; 1995 Jan; 12(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 7724473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of AUCs from sparsely sampled populations in toxicology studies.
    Pai SM; Fettner SH; Hajian G; Cayen MN; Batra VK
    Pharm Res; 1996 Sep; 13(9):1283-90. PubMed ID: 8893263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Criteria to assess in vivo performance of sustained release products: application to diltiazem formulations.
    Bialer M; Sussan S; Abu Salach O; Danenberg HD; Ben-David J; Gibor Y; Laor A
    J Pharm Sci; 1995 Oct; 84(10):1160-3. PubMed ID: 8801328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Bayesian approach and a limited sampling model for the estimation of AUC and Cmax: a computer simulation analysis.
    Mahmood I; Miller R
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1999 Sep; 37(9):439-45. PubMed ID: 10507242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absorption profiling of cyclosporine microemulsion (neoral) during the first 2 weeks after renal transplantation.
    Canadian Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group
    Transplantation; 2001 Sep; 72(6):1024-32. PubMed ID: 11579295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limited sampling model for the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters in children.
    Mahmood I
    Ther Drug Monit; 2000 Oct; 22(5):532-6. PubMed ID: 11034257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioequivalence study of two limaprost alfadex 5 microg tablets in healthy subjects: moisture-resistant tablet (dextran formulation) versus standard tablet (lactose formulation).
    Nakade S; Komaba J; Ohno T; Kitagawa J; Furukawa K; Miyata Y
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Jan; 46(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 18218297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utility of capillary microsampling for rat pharmacokinetic studies: Comparison of tail-vein bleed to jugular vein cannula sampling.
    Korfmacher W; Luo Y; Ho S; Sun W; Shen L; Wang J; Wu Z; Guo Y; Snow G; O'Shea T
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 76():7-14. PubMed ID: 26164093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioequivalence study of generic tablet formulations containing ethinylestradiol and chlormadinone acetate in healthy female volunteers.
    Bonn M; Eydeler U; Barkworth M; Rovati LC
    Arzneimittelforschung; 2009; 59(12):651-8. PubMed ID: 20108652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of microdialysis for the study of drug kinetics: some methodological considerations illustrated with antipyrine in rat frontal cortex.
    Patsalos PN; Abed WT; Alavijeh MS; O'Connell MT
    Br J Pharmacol; 1995 Jun; 115(3):503-9. PubMed ID: 7582464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.