32 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8842162)
1. Cytohistological correlation of endocervical gland involvement with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Kir G; Karabulut M; Yilmaz M; Topal C; Gocmen A
J Cytol; 2012 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 22787292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endocervical glandular involvement, positive endocervical surgical margin and multicentricity are more often associated with high-grade than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Kır G; Karabulut MH; Topal CS; Yılmaz MS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1206-10. PubMed ID: 22540878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytologic features of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions involving endocervical glands on ThinPrep cytology.
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Mar; 26(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 11892025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: screening and diagnostic errors in Papanicolaou smears.
Ruba S; Schoolland M; Allpress S; Sterrett G
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):280-7. PubMed ID: 15376198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atypical endocervical glandular cells: accuracy of cytologic diagnosis.
Lee KR; Manna EA; St John T
Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Oct; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 8575278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears. A study with cytohistologic correlation.
Burja IT; Thompson SK; Sawyer WL; Shurbaji MS
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 10349361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN 3) with extension into the endocervical clefts. Difficulty of cytologic differentiation from adenocarcinoma in situ.
Drijkoningen M; Meertens B; Lauweryns J
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(5):889-94. PubMed ID: 8842162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Solomon D; Frable WJ; Vooijs GP; Wilbur DC; Amma NS; Collins RJ; Davey DD; Knight BK; Luff RD; Meisels A; Navin J; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Stoler M; Suprun HZ; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 9479320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix: morphology and molecular pathology].
Horn LC; Klostermann K
Pathologe; 2011 Nov; 32 Suppl 2():242-54. PubMed ID: 21909794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Symposium part I: adenocarcinoma in situ, glandular dysplasia, and early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Zaino RJ
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2002 Oct; 21(4):314-26. PubMed ID: 12352181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Categorization of uterine cervix tumors : What's new in the 2014 WHO classification].
Lax SF; Horn LC; Löning T
Pathologe; 2016 Nov; 37(6):573-584. PubMed ID: 27770187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
