82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8842185)
1. Assessing costs and benefits of PAPNET.
Boon ME
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(5):1109-11. PubMed ID: 8842185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Costs and benefits of alternative rescreening strategies.
Schechter CB
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(5):1111-4. PubMed ID: 8842186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rescreening of cervical Papanicolaou smears using PAPNET.
Schechter CB
JAMA; 1998 Jun; 279(22):1787; author reply 1787-8. PubMed ID: 9628708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rescreening of cervical Papanicolaou smears using PAPNET.
Mango LJ; Radensky PW
JAMA; 1998 Jun; 279(22):1786-7; author reply 1787-8. PubMed ID: 9628707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the costs and benefits of alternative rescreening strategies.
Hutchinson ML
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8604573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost analysis of PAPNET-assisted vs. conventional Pap smear evaluation in primary screening of cervical smears.
Meerding WJ; Doornewaard H; van Ballegooijen M; Bos A; van der Graaf Y; van den Tweel JG; van der Schouw YT; Habbema JD
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11213501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cervical smears. Contribution of automated screening].
Ziol M; Vacher-Lavenu MC
Ann Pathol; 1996 Nov; 16(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 9004722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System.
Rosenthal DL; Acosta D; Peters RK
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of automated and semi-automated cervical screening devices: a systematic review of the literature.
Broadstock M
N Z Med J; 2001 Jul; 114(1135):311-3. PubMed ID: 11556445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The Thin Prep Pap Test; a platform for gynecologic diagnosis].
Scimia M
Pathologica; 2002 Feb; 94(1):63-4. PubMed ID: 11912883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding the financial impact of covering new screening technologies. The case of automated Pap smears.
McQuarrie HG; Ogden J; Costa M
J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):898-906. PubMed ID: 11127101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The PAPNET system in the rescreening of negative cervical/vaginal smears. A study from the Imola cytology laboratory].
Ghidoni D; Fabbris E; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Medri M; Bucchi L; Bondi A
Pathologica; 1998 Aug; 90(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 9793395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. PRISMATIC Project Management Team.
Lancet; 1999 Apr; 353(9162):1381-5. PubMed ID: 10227217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automation in cervical cytology: whose cost and whose benefit?
Wain GV
Med J Aust; 1997 Nov; 167(9):460-1. PubMed ID: 9397056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximal efficiency of PAPNET in the diagnosis of infections in cervicovaginal smears.
Polus E; Karttunen TJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 May; 28(5):286-7. PubMed ID: 12722127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the PAPNET system for prescreening triage of cervicovaginal smears.
Ashfaq R; Saliger F; Solares B; Thomas S; Liu G; Liang Y; Saboorian MH
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1058-64. PubMed ID: 9250299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of laboratory false negative smears by the PAPNET cytologic screening system.
Mitchell H; Medley G
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 9479350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ultimate goal? It depends.
Brown E
Physician Exec; 1996 Oct; 22(10):50-2. PubMed ID: 10162496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficiency of PAPNET in detecting infectious organisms in cervicovaginal smears.
Ashfaq R; Thomas S; Saboorian MH
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(5):885-8. PubMed ID: 8842161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased cervical cytologic smear access through increased capacity.
Shaver JL
J Reprod Med; 1998 Nov; 43(11):1005-6. PubMed ID: 9839272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
