BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8845596)

  • 1. Accuracy and the influence of marrow fat on quantitative CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the femoral neck in vitro.
    Kuiper JW; van Kuijk C; Grashuis JL; Ederveen AG; Schütte HE
    Osteoporos Int; 1996; 6(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8845596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy, agreement, and reliability of DECT-derived vBMD measurements: an initial ex vivo study.
    Qin L; Huang J; Yu P; Yan J; Ge Y; Lu Y; Yan F; Wang L; Du L
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):191-199. PubMed ID: 32757052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry.
    Cheng XG; Lowet G; Boonen S; Nicholson PH; Brys P; Nijs J; Dequeker J
    Bone; 1997 Mar; 20(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 9071471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnosis of low bone mass in CKD-5D patients.
    Blomquist GA; Davenport DL; Mawad HW; Monier-Faugere MC; Malluche HH
    Clin Nephrol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 26587778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of anthropometric parameters and bone size on bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry at the hip.
    Guglielmi G; van Kuijk C; Li J; Meta MD; Scillitani A; Lang TF
    Acta Radiol; 2006 Jul; 47(6):574-80. PubMed ID: 16875335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative computed tomographic evaluation of bone mineral density in beagle dogs: comparison with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a gold standard.
    Kwon D; Kim J; Lee H; Kim B; Han H; Oh H; Kim M; Yoon H; Lee B; Eom K
    J Vet Med Sci; 2018 Apr; 80(4):620-628. PubMed ID: 29415919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores.
    Khoo BC; Brown K; Cann C; Zhu K; Henzell S; Low V; Gustafsson S; Price RI; Prince RL
    Osteoporos Int; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1539-45. PubMed ID: 19107384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulated increases in body fat and errors in bone mineral density measurements by DXA and QCT.
    Yu EW; Thomas BJ; Brown JK; Finkelstein JS
    J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Jan; 27(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 21915902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.
    Lafferty FW; Rowland DY
    Osteoporos Int; 1996; 6(5):407-15. PubMed ID: 8931036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in structural geometrical outcomes at the neck of the proximal femur using two-dimensional DXA-derived projection (APEX) and three-dimensional QCT-derived (BIT QCT) techniques.
    Khoo BC; Brown K; Zhu K; Pollock M; Wilson KE; Price RI; Prince RL
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Apr; 23(4):1393-8. PubMed ID: 21786006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.
    Bousson V; Le Bras A; Roqueplan F; Kang Y; Mitton D; Kolta S; Bergot C; Skalli W; Vicaut E; Kalender W; Engelke K; Laredo JD
    Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 16547689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal changes in volumetric bone mineral density in postmenopausal women using single- versus dual-energy quantitative computed tomography.
    Sfeir JG; Drake MT; Atkinson EJ; Achenbach SJ; Camp JJ; Tweed AJ; McCready LK; Yu L; Adkins MC; Amin S; Khosla S
    Bone; 2018 Jul; 112():145-152. PubMed ID: 29704696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of the assessment of 4 determinants of structural geometry on QCT- and DXA-derived hip structural analysis measurements in elderly women.
    Khoo BC; Brown K; Zhu K; Price RI; Prince RL
    J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 23578719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of DXA and CT based methods for estimating the strength of the femoral neck in post-menopausal women.
    Danielson ME; Beck TJ; Karlamangla AS; Greendale GA; Atkinson EJ; Lian Y; Khaled AS; Keaveny TM; Kopperdahl D; Ruppert K; Greenspan S; Vuga M; Cauley JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2013 Apr; 24(4):1379-88. PubMed ID: 22810918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-energy CT hybridation and kernel processing effects on the estimation of bone mineral mass and density: a calcination study on ex vivo human femur.
    Wagner PP; Roux JP; Chuzel Q; Szulc P; Bermond F; Duboeuf F; Chapurlat R; Follet H; Pialat JB
    Osteoporos Int; 2022 Apr; 33(4):909-920. PubMed ID: 34837503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of quantitative computed tomography-derived areal bone mineral density with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in an elderly Chinese population.
    Cheng X; Wang L; Wang Q; Ma Y; Su Y; Li K
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(8):1445-9. PubMed ID: 24762586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vertebral bone density evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in vitro.
    Ebbesen EN; Thomsen JS; Beck-Nielsen H; Nepper-Rasmussen HJ; Mosekilde L
    Bone; 1998 Sep; 23(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 9737351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vivo comparison of hip structure analysis (HSA) with measurements obtained by QCT.
    Ramamurthi K; Ahmad O; Engelke K; Taylor RH; Zhu K; Gustafsson S; Prince RL; Wilson KE
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Feb; 23(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 21394495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
    Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of peripheral quantitative computed tomography forearm bone density versus DXA in rheumatoid arthritis patients and controls.
    Juhász B; Gulyás K; Horváth Á; Pethő Z; Bhattoa HP; Váncsa A; Szekanecz É; Horváth C; Kocsis J; Horváth Z; Hodosi K; Szántó S; Szűcs G; Szekanecz Z
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Apr; 28(4):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 27942777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.