These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8846180)
1. The effect of a surveillance programme on the patency of synthetic infrainguinal bypass grafts. Dunlop P; Sayers RD; Naylor AR; Bell PR; London NJ Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1996 May; 11(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 8846180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Femoropopliteal bypass with a compliant, composite polyurethane/Dacron graft: short-term results of a multicentre trial. Dereume JP; van Romphey A; Vincent G; Engelmann E Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Oct; 1(5):499-503. PubMed ID: 8076085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The consequences of a failed femoropopliteal bypass grafting: comparison of saphenous vein and PTFE grafts. Jackson MR; Belott TP; Dickason T; Kaiser WJ; Modrall JG; Valentine RJ; Clagett GP J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):498-504; 504-5. PubMed ID: 10957656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Five-year outcomes following a randomized trial of femorofemoral and femoropopliteal bypass grafting with heparin-bonded or standard polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Lindholt JS; Houlind K; Gottschalksen B; Pedersen CN; Ravn H; Viddal B; Pedersen G; Rasmussen M; Wedel C; Bramsen MB Br J Surg; 2016 Sep; 103(10):1300-5. PubMed ID: 27477951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized comparison of ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft vs prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. McQuade K; Gable D; Hohman S; Pearl G; Theune B J Vasc Surg; 2009 Jan; 49(1):109-15, 116.e1-9; discussion 116. PubMed ID: 19028055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy between the FUSION BIOLINE heparin-coated vascular graft and the standard expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft for femoropopliteal bypass. Lumsden AB; Morrissey NJ; J Vasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 61(3):703-12.e1. PubMed ID: 25720929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Duplex scan surveillance of infra-inguinal bypass grafts: the case for selectivity. Bourke BM Aust N Z J Surg; 1992 Aug; 62(8):611-7. PubMed ID: 1642581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome of the FUSION vascular graft for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. Assadian A; Eckstein HH; J Vasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 61(3):713-9.e1. PubMed ID: 25498193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-center experience in endovascular treatment for infrainguinal bypass obstructions. Baumann F; Engelberger RP; Makaloski V; Do DD; Baumgartner I; Diehm N J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Aug; 23(8):1055-62. PubMed ID: 22840804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidentally detected stenoses proximal to grafts originating below the common femoral artery: do they affect graft patency or warrant repair in asymptomatic patients? Treiman GS; Ashrafi A; Lawrence PF J Vasc Surg; 2000 Dec; 32(6):1180-9. PubMed ID: 11107091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term results of a multicenter randomized study on direct versus crossover bypass for unilateral iliac artery occlusive disease. Ricco JB; Probst H; J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 47(1):45-53; discussion 53-4. PubMed ID: 17997269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of graft type on patency of infrainguinal arterial bypass grafts. Neale ML; Graham JC; Lane RJ; Cheung DS; Appleberg M J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 8173726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]