These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8847002)

  • 1. Validation of skin sensitization assays.
    Basketter DA; Chamberlain M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1995 Dec; 33(12):1057-9. PubMed ID: 8847002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An alternative strategy to the use of guinea pigs for the identification of skin sensitization hazard.
    Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Chamberlain M; Barratt MD
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1995 Dec; 33(12):1051-6. PubMed ID: 8847001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chemical load as a factor in skin sensitization risk assessment: rodent versus man.
    Anigbogu AN; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Feb; 44(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11205398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Joint positive control testing in guinea pig skin sensitization tests. A harmonized approach.
    Wiemann C; Berthold K; Heusener A; Krüger N; Seeberger A; Stropp G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Feb; 35(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 11846632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guinea-pig contact sensitization assays.
    Maurer T; Arthur A; Bentley P
    Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 7974504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
    Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guinea pig sensitization assays: an experimental comparison of three methods.
    Modjtahedi BS; Fortenbach CR; Marsano JG; Gandhi AM; Staab R; Maibach HI
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 30(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 21265706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skin sensitisation.
    Basketter D; Casati S; Gerberick GF; Griem P; Philips B; Worth A
    Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():83-103. PubMed ID: 16194142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concordance of patch test results with four new TRUE test allergens compared with the same allergens from Chemotechnique.
    Andersen KE; Paulsen E
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jan; 60(1):59. PubMed ID: 19125728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skin Sensitization: Challenging the Conventional Thinking-A Case Against 2 Out of 3 as Integrated Testing Strategy.
    Johansson H; Gradin R
    Toxicol Sci; 2017 Sep; 159(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 28633468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updating the skin sensitization in vitro data assessment paradigm in 2009--a chemistry and QSAR perspective.
    Roberts DW; Patlewicz GY
    J Appl Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 30(3):286-8; discussion 289. PubMed ID: 20131408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chemical sensitization and allergotoxicology.
    Van Den Heuvel RL; Lambrechts N; Verstraelen S; Nelissen IC; Schoeters GE
    Exp Suppl; 2012; 101():289-314. PubMed ID: 22945573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A skin sensitization risk assessment approach for evaluation of new ingredients and products.
    Gerberick GF; Robinson MK
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Jun; 11(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 10908173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials.
    Bauch C; Kolle SN; Ramirez T; Eltze T; Fabian E; Mehling A; Teubner W; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 63(3):489-504. PubMed ID: 22659254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skin sensitization, false positives and false negatives: experience with guinea pig assays.
    Basketter DA; Kimber I
    J Appl Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 30(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 20583317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing.
    McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 31(4):292-305. PubMed ID: 22494060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact sensitization assays in guinea-pigs: are they predictive of the potential for systemic allergic reactions?
    Vial T; Descotes J
    Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 7974506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduction, refinement and replacement: putting the immune system to work.
    Kimber I
    Altern Lab Anim; 2002; 30(6):569-77. PubMed ID: 12511192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
    Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interactions of contact allergens with dendritic cells: opportunities and challenges for the development of novel approaches to hazard assessment.
    Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Gildea LA; Hulette BC; Betts CJ; Cumberbatch M; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Toxicol Sci; 2005 Nov; 88(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16014741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.