These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8847002)

  • 41. Skin sensitization: Implications for integration of clinical data into hazard identification and risk assessment.
    Basketter DA; White IR; McFadden JP; Kimber I
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2015 Dec; 34(12):1222-30. PubMed ID: 26614809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Identification of new allergens and non-irritant patch test preparations.
    Wahlberg JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Sep; 39(3):155-6. PubMed ID: 9772008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Trends in the results of patch testing to standard allergens over the period 1984-1995.
    Katsarou A; Kalogeromitros D; Armenaka M; Koufou V; Davou E; Koumantaki E
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Nov; 37(5):245-6. PubMed ID: 9412763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The local lymph node assay: developments and applications.
    Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Scholes EW; Basketter DA
    Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 7974502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A fluorescence high throughput screening method for the detection of reactive electrophiles as potential skin sensitizers.
    Avonto C; Chittiboyina AG; Rua D; Khan IA
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Dec; 289(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 26455772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Propylene glycol, skin sensitisation and allergic contact dermatitis: A scientific and regulatory conundrum.
    Pemberton MA; Kimber I
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Feb; 138():105341. PubMed ID: 36702195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Trends in patch-test results and allergen changes in the standard series: a Mayo Clinic 5-year retrospective review (January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010).
    Wentworth AB; Yiannias JA; Keeling JH; Hall MR; Camilleri MJ; Drage LA; Torgerson RR; Fett DD; Prakash AV; Scalf LA; Allen EM; Johnson JS; Singh N; Nordberg Linehan DL; Killian JM; Davis MD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Feb; 70(2):269-75.e4. PubMed ID: 24268786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. NCTC 2544 and IL-18 production: a tool for the identification of contact allergens.
    Corsini E; Galbiati V; Mitjans M; Galli CL; Marinovich M
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Apr; 27(3):1127-34. PubMed ID: 23063874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The critical review of methodologies and approaches to assess the inherent skin sensitization potential (skin allergies) of chemicals. Part I.
    Thyssen JP; Giménez-Arnau E; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Boman A; Schnuch A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Apr; 66 Suppl 1():11-24. PubMed ID: 22380840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Study on standard of patch test for cosmetic allergens].
    Xue C; Cai R; Sun X; Zhao X
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 1997 Mar; 26(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 10325604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison and validation of an in vitro skin sensitization strategy using a data set of 33 chemical references.
    Clouet E; Kerdine-Römer S; Ferret PJ
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Dec; 45(Pt 3):374-385. PubMed ID: 28539215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated?
    Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
    J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reproducibility of patch tests: comparison of identical test allergens from different commercial sources.
    Schiessl C; Wolber C; Strohal R
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jan; 50(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15059100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Patch Test Series for Allergic Perineal Dermatitis in the Diapered Infant.
    Yu J; Treat J; Brod B
    Dermatitis; 2017; 28(1):70-75. PubMed ID: 28002234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The skin sensitization potential of four alkylalkanolamines.
    Leung HW; Blaszcak DL
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 40(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 9554055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. In chemico, in vitro and in vivo comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of eight unsaturated and one saturated lipid compounds.
    Kreiling R; Gehrke H; Broschard TH; Dreeßen B; Eigler D; Hart D; Höpflinger V; Kleber M; Kupny J; Li Q; Ungeheuer P; Sauer UG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Nov; 90():262-276. PubMed ID: 28958912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Myeloid U937 Skin Sensitization Test (U-SENS) addresses the activation of dendritic cell event in the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization.
    Piroird C; Ovigne JM; Rousset F; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Gomes C; Cotovio J; Alépée N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Aug; 29(5):901-16. PubMed ID: 25820135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Contact sensitization to European baseline series of allergens in university students in Beijing.
    Li LF
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Jun; 62(6):371-2. PubMed ID: 20557344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparative study of the sensitivity of the 3-induction and 9-induction Buehler test procedures for assessing skin sensitisation potential.
    Botham P; Urtizberea M; Wiemann C; Manciaux X; Tilbury L; Vohr HW; Allen S; Carmichael NG; de Jouffrey S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15582197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluating Skin Sensitization Via Soft and Hard Multivariate Modeling.
    Silva FALS; Brites G; Ferreira I; Silva A; Miguel Neves B; Costa Pereira JLGFS; Cruz MT
    Int J Toxicol; 2020; 39(6):547-559. PubMed ID: 32757797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.