These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8847002)

  • 61. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods.
    Haneke KE; Tice RR; Carson BL; Margolin BH; Stokes WS
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 11754531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
    Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 18058304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Performance standards and alternative assays: practical insights from skin sensitization.
    Kolle SN; Basketter DA; Casati S; Stokes WS; Strickland J; van Ravenzwaay B; Vohr HW; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Mar; 65(2):278-85. PubMed ID: 23279805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Relevance and reproducibility of patch-test reactions to corticosteroids.
    Devos SA; Van Der Valk PG
    Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Jun; 44(6):362-5. PubMed ID: 11380547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis.
    Bruze M; Condé-Salazar L; Goossens A; Kanerva L; White IR
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Nov; 41(5):241-50. PubMed ID: 10554056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Further development of the NCTC 2544 IL-18 assay to identify in vitro contact allergens.
    Galbiati V; Mitjans M; Lucchi L; Viviani B; Galli CL; Marinovich M; Corsini E
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Apr; 25(3):724-32. PubMed ID: 21182927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Skin sensitisation and epidermal disposition: the relevance of epidermal disposition for sensitisation hazard identification and risk assessment. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 59.
    Basketter D; Pease C; Kasting G; Kimber I; Casati S; Cronin M; Diembeck W; Gerberick F; Hadgraft J; Hartung T; Marty JP; Nikolaidis E; Patlewicz G; Roberts D; Roggen E; Rovida C; van de Sandt J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Mar; 35(1):137-54. PubMed ID: 17411362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. An answer to some questions raised by skin reactions observed during squaric acid dibutylester contact sensitization.
    Happle R
    Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Sep; 45(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 11553162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Designation of substances as skin sensitizing chemicals: a reply.
    Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Becker D; Diepgen TL; Drexler H; Erdmann S; Fartasch M; Greim H; Kricke-Helling P; Merget R; Merk H; Nowak D; Rothe A; Stropp G; Wallenstein G; Uter W
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2005 Mar; 24(3):157-9. PubMed ID: 15901055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results 2013-2014.
    DeKoven JG; Warshaw EM; Belsito DV; Sasseville D; Maibach HI; Taylor JS; Marks JG; Fowler JF; Mathias CG; DeLeo VA; Pratt MD; Zirwas MJ; Zug KA
    Dermatitis; 2017; 28(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 27775967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Murine local lymph node assay: an alternative test method for skin hypersensitivity testing.
    Sailstad DM
    Lab Anim (NY); 2002; 31(7):36-41. PubMed ID: 12200592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. [Patch tests should be performed by experiences dermatologists. Many allergens can cause contact dermatitis].
    Lindberg M; Bruze M
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Oct; 92(40):3673-5. PubMed ID: 7564614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000.
    Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS;
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2003 Jun; 14(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 14749021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparison of the predictive nature of the Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection (GARD) assay with mammalian assays in determining the skin sensitisation potential of agrochemical active ingredients.
    Masinja W; Elliott C; Modi S; Enoch SJ; Cronin MTD; McInnes EF; Currie RA
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2021 Feb; 70():105017. PubMed ID: 33038465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Allergic contact dermatitis to gold.
    Ehrlich A; Belsito DV
    Cutis; 2000 May; 65(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 10826096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis.
    Keir J; English J; Fergie N
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 May; 123(5):558-9. PubMed ID: 19138454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile: skin sensitization and quantitative risk assessment.
    Basketter DA
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2010 Mar; 29(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 19883218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. An interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test for the identification and classification of skin sensitizers.
    Basketter DA; Gerberick GF
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Sep; 35(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 8930474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Experimental study of contact dermatitis due to alstroemeria in guinea pigs.
    Harada K; Ohmori S; Wei CN; Arimatsu Y; Ueda A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Aug; 39(2):82. PubMed ID: 9746188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Assessment of the skin sensitising potency of the lower alkyl methacrylate esters.
    Kimber I; Pemberton MA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Oct; 70(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 24956587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.