BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 884816)

  • 1. Clinical and hemodynamic results following triple valve replacement: mechanical vs porcine xenograft prostheses.
    Rhodes GR; McIntosh CL; Redwood DR; Itscoitz SB; Epstein SE
    Circulation; 1977 Sep; 56(3 Suppl):II122-7. PubMed ID: 884816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heart valve replacement with the Hancock bioprosthesis. Analysis of long-term results.
    Cévese PG; Gallucci V; Morea M; Dalla Volta S; Fasoli G; Casarotto D
    Circulation; 1977 Sep; 56(3 Suppl):II111-6. PubMed ID: 407032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Early and late term results of triple valve replacements. Use of a tricuspid bioprosthesis].
    Mikaeloff P; Delahaye JP; Convert G; Van Haecke P; Amouroux C; Boivin J
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Jun; 74(6):719-25. PubMed ID: 6457576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic and mitral valve surgery on the beating heart is lowering cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time.
    Gersak B; Sutlic Z
    Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 12125670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heart valve replacement with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft.
    Ionescu MI; Tandon AP; Mary DA; Abid A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1977 Jan; 73(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 831009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 5 1/2 year experience with the St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prosthesis. Early and late results of 737 valve replacements in 671 patients.
    Baudet EM; Oca CC; Roques XF; Laborde MN; Hafez AS; Collot MA; Ghidoni IM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Jul; 90(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 3874324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effect of prosthetic heart valve replacement on the natural course of isolated mitral and aortic as well as multivalvular diseases. Clinical results in 783 patients up to 8 years following implantation of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis].
    Horstkotte D; Loogen F; Kleikamp G; Schulte HD; Trampisch HJ; Bircks W
    Z Kardiol; 1983 Sep; 72(9):494-503. PubMed ID: 6636932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
    Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Leung Y; Ohri SK; Haw MP; Ross JK; Livesey SA; Monro JL
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Triple valve replacement. Evaluation of 90 surgically treated patients].
    Bourezak SE; Chauvaud S; Romano M; Carpentier A; Blondeau P; Mostefai MC; Dubost C
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1984 Jul; 77(7):724-9. PubMed ID: 6433834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve prosthesis. A 5 year experience.
    Chaux A; Czer LS; Matloff JM; DeRobertis MA; Stewart ME; Bateman TM; Kass RM; Lee ME; Gray RJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):706-17. PubMed ID: 6492839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac valve replacement in children: comparison of tissue with mechanical prostheses.
    Sade RM; Ballenger JF; Hohn AR; Arrants JE; Riopel DA; Taylor AB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Jul; 78(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 571943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemodynamic assessment of the glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine heterograft in the aortic and mitral positions.
    Lurie AJ; Miller RR; Maxwell KS; Grehl TM; Vismara LA; Hurley EJ; Mason DT
    Circulation; 1977 Sep; 56(3 Suppl):II104-10. PubMed ID: 407031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
    Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and hemodynamic results of cardiac valve replacement with the Monostrut Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
    Aris A; Padró JM; Cámara ML; Crexells C; Augé JM; Caralps JM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Mar; 95(3):423-31. PubMed ID: 3343851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aortic valve replacement with small-sized disc prostheses (medtronic hall).
    Brazao AJ; Prieto D; de Oliveira JF; Eugenio L; Antunes MJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):680-6. PubMed ID: 10616248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple valve surgery with beating heart technique.
    Ricci M; Macedo FI; Suarez MR; Brown M; Alba J; Salerno TA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 87(2):527-31. PubMed ID: 19161773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current status of porcine heterograft prostheses: a 5-year appraisal.
    Hannah H; Reis RL
    Circulation; 1976 Dec; 54(6 Suppl):III27-31. PubMed ID: 1033047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Triple valve surgery: a 25-year experience.
    Yilmaz M; Ozkan M; Böke E
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2004 Sep; 4(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 15355820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What to expect after tricuspid valve replacement? Long-term results.
    Iscan ZH; Vural KM; Bahar I; Mavioglu L; Saritas A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Aug; 32(2):296-300. PubMed ID: 17555971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cardiac valve replacement in the elderly].
    Misawa Y; Hasegewa T; Kato M
    Kyobu Geka; 1992 Oct; 45(11):960-3. PubMed ID: 1434249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.