These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8849200)

  • 1. DNA amplification assays: a new standard for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    Quinn TC
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1995 Jul; 24(4):627-33. PubMed ID: 8849200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of ligase chain reaction and polymerase chain reaction on urine specimens to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic in Singapore.
    Tan HH; Chan RK; Teo AS; Boey LP
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1999 Mar; 28(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 10497676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Abbott LCx ligase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine and genital swab specimens from a sexually transmitted disease clinic population.
    Carroll KC; Aldeen WE; Morrison M; Anderson R; Lee D; Mottice S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1630-3. PubMed ID: 9620391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening women for chlamydia trachomatis in family planning clinics: the cost-effectiveness of DNA amplification assays.
    Howell MR; Quinn TC; Brathwaite W; Gaydos CA
    Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Feb; 25(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 9518379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Head-to-head multicenter comparison of DNA probe and nucleic acid amplification tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women performed with an improved reference standard.
    Black CM; Marrazzo J; Johnson RE; Hook EW; Jones RB; Green TA; Schachter J; Stamm WE; Bolan G; St Louis ME; Martin DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Oct; 40(10):3757-63. PubMed ID: 12354877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine.
    Lee HH; Chernesky MA; Schachter J; Burczak JD; Andrews WW; Muldoon S; Leckie G; Stamm WE
    Lancet; 1995 Jan; 345(8944):213-6. PubMed ID: 7823713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Urine as a diagnostic specimen for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Malaysia by ligase chain reaction.
    Gaydos CA; Ngeow YF; Lee HH; Canavaggio M; Welsh LE; Johanson J; Quinn TC
    Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(5):402-6. PubMed ID: 8885072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Puolakkainen M; Hiltunen-Back E; Reunala T; Suhonen S; Lähteenmäki P; Lehtinen M; Paavonen J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1489-93. PubMed ID: 9620366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction.
    van Doornum GJ; Buimer M; Prins M; Henquet CJ; Coutinho RA; Plier PK; Tomazic-Allen S; Hu H; Lee H
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Aug; 33(8):2042-7. PubMed ID: 7559945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of ligase chain reaction to polymerase chain reaction in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections.
    Davis JD; Riley PK; Peters CW; Rand KH
    Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 6(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 9702586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimised sample DNA preparation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in synovial tissue by polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction.
    Freise J; Gérard HC; Bunke T; Whittum-Hudson JA; Zeidler H; Köhler L; Hudson AP; Kuipers JG
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2001 Feb; 60(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 11156547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction compared with polymerase chain reaction and cell culture in urogenital specimens.
    de Barbeyrac B; Rodriguez P; Dutilh B; Le Roux P; Bébéar C
    Genitourin Med; 1995 Dec; 71(6):382-6. PubMed ID: 8566978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical and urine specimens from women and urethral and urine specimens from men attending sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics.
    Ferrero DV; Meyers HN; Schultz DE; Willis SA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3230-3. PubMed ID: 9774570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Urinary inhibitors of polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction and testing of multiple specimens may contribute to lower assay sensitivities for diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis infected women.
    Chernesky MA; Jang D; Sellors J; Luinstra K; Chong S; Castriciano S; Mahony JB
    Mol Cell Probes; 1997 Aug; 11(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 9281409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
    Wu CH; Lee MF; Yin SC; Yang DM; Cheng SF
    Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1411833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR in genitourinary specimens from men and women attending an STD clinic.
    Bhalla P; Baveja UK; Chawla R; Saini S; Khaki P; Bhalla K; Mahajan S; Reddy BS
    J Commun Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18338709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine samples by nucleic acid tests: comparison with culture and enzyme immunoassay of genital swab specimens.
    Schepetiuk S; Kok T; Martin L; Waddell R; Higgins G
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3355-7. PubMed ID: 9399559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of transcription-mediated amplification and ligase chain reaction assays for detection of chlamydial infection in urogenital samples obtained by invasive and noninvasive methods.
    Stary A; Schuh E; Kerschbaumer M; Götz B; Lee H
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Sep; 36(9):2666-70. PubMed ID: 9705411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Urine specimens from pregnant and nonpregnant women inhibitory to amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid by PCR, ligase chain reaction, and transcription-mediated amplification: identification of urinary substances associated with inhibition and removal of inhibitory activity.
    Mahony J; Chong S; Jang D; Luinstra K; Faught M; Dalby D; Sellors J; Chernesky M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3122-6. PubMed ID: 9774550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    van Doornum GJ; Schouls LM; Pijl A; Cairo I; Buimer M; Bruisten S
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 11230391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.