These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8849495)

  • 1. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.
    Muir BM; Moray N
    Ergonomics; 1996 Mar; 39(3):429-60. PubMed ID: 8849495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems.
    Lee J; Moray N
    Ergonomics; 1992 Oct; 35(10):1243-70. PubMed ID: 1516577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.
    Karpinsky ND; Chancey ET; Palmer DB; Yamani Y
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():194-201. PubMed ID: 29866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revisiting human-machine trust: a replication study of Muir and Moray (1996) using a simulated pasteurizer plant task.
    Lee J; Yamani Y; Long SK; Unverricht J; Itoh M
    Ergonomics; 2021 Sep; 64(9):1132-1145. PubMed ID: 33818301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics; 2009 May; 52(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 19296323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
    Endsley MR; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. System reliability, performance and trust in adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jan; 52():333-42. PubMed ID: 26360226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward Quantifying Trust Dynamics: How People Adjust Their Trust After Moment-to-Moment Interaction With Automation.
    Yang XJ; Schemanske C; Searle C
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):862-878. PubMed ID: 34459266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models.
    Parasuraman R
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jul; 43(7):931-51. PubMed ID: 10929828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting performance on a target monitoring task employing an automatic tracker.
    McFadden SM; Vimalachandran A; Blackmore E
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 14668161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of extended lay-off periods on performance and operator trust under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt A():241-51. PubMed ID: 26603139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experience of automation failures in training: effects on trust, automation bias, complacency and performance.
    Sauer J; Chavaillaz A; Wastell D
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):767-80. PubMed ID: 26374396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated assistance for human factors analysis in complex systems.
    Gregoriades A; Sutcliffe AG
    Ergonomics; 2006 Oct 10-22; 49(12-13):1265-87. PubMed ID: 17008256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Procedural errors in air traffic control: effects of traffic density, expertise, and automation.
    Di Nocera F; Fabrizi R; Terenzi M; Ferlazzo F
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Jun; 77(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 16780243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semi-automated CCTV surveillance: the effects of system confidence, system accuracy and task complexity on operator vigilance, reliance and workload.
    Dadashi N; Stedmon AW; Pridmore TP
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):730-8. PubMed ID: 22704458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How practice produces suboptimal heuristics that render backup instruments ineffective.
    Youmans RJ; Ohlsson S
    Ergonomics; 2008 Apr; 51(4):441-75. PubMed ID: 18357535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dynamics of trust: comparing humans to automation.
    Lewandowsky S; Mundy M; Tan GP
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Jun; 6(2):104-23. PubMed ID: 10937315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.
    Hoff KA; Bashir M
    Hum Factors; 2015 May; 57(3):407-34. PubMed ID: 25875432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.