These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct. Vences M; Zardoya R Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Need for a court to rule on patents and misconduct. Bihain BE Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6951):875. PubMed ID: 12931157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Education and penalties are key to tackling misconduct. Wang K Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7051):626. PubMed ID: 16079819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quarrel over book leads to call for misconduct inquiry. Dalton R Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):889. PubMed ID: 15496886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. One in three scientists confesses to having sinned. Wadman M Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):718-9. PubMed ID: 15944656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct. Reynolds GH Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Japan ponders steps to probe data errors. Cyranoski D Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6914):348. PubMed ID: 12459746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct. Wadman M Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]