These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8850057)

  • 1. Materials for endosseous dental implants.
    Wataha JC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Feb; 23(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 8850057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Materials characteristics of uncoated/ceramic-coated implant materials.
    Lacefield WR
    Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():21-6. PubMed ID: 11276742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.
    Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
    Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
    J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the interface between bone and titanium surfaces being blasted by aluminium oxide or bioceramic particles.
    Müeller WD; Gross U; Fritz T; Voigt C; Fischer P; Berger G; Rogaschewski S; Lange KP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Jun; 14(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12755785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Composite morphology of the bone and associated support-tissue interfaces to osseointegrated dental implants: TEM and HVEM analyses.
    Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Buttle K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 9274073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crestal remodelling and osseointegration at surface-modified commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implants in a canine model.
    Lee J; Hurson S; Tadros H; Schüpbach P; Susin C; Wikesjö UM
    J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Aug; 39(8):781-8. PubMed ID: 22671935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Osseointegration of Titanium Implants With Different Rough Surfaces: A Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in an Adult Minipig Model.
    Fabbro MD; Taschieri S; Canciani E; Addis A; Musto F; Weinstein R; Dellavia C
    Implant Dent; 2017 Jun; 26(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 28234707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biocompatibility and biofunctionality of implanted materials.
    Cook SD; Dalton JE
    Alpha Omegan; 1992; 85(4):41-7. PubMed ID: 1308341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Light and transmission electron microscopy of the intact interfaces between non-submerged titanium-coated epoxy resin implants and bone or gingiva.
    Listgarten MA; Buser D; Steinemann SG; Donath K; Lang NP; Weber HP
    J Dent Res; 1992 Feb; 71(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 1556294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
    Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone ingrowth and initial stability of titanium and porous tantalum dental implants: a pilot canine study.
    Kim DG; Huja SS; Tee BC; Larsen PE; Kennedy KS; Chien HH; Lee JW; Wen HB
    Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 23823737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postmortem histologic evaluation of mandibular titanium and maxillary hydroxyapatite-coated implants from 1 patient.
    Rohrer MD; Sobczak RR; Prasad HS; Morris HF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):579-86. PubMed ID: 10453675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do implant surfaces make a difference?
    Meffert RM
    Curr Opin Periodontol; 1997; 4():104-8. PubMed ID: 9655029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element analysis of bone-adapted and bone-bonded endosseous implants.
    Rieger MR; Adams WK; Kinzel GL; Brose MO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):436-40. PubMed ID: 2685245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrastructural investigations of the bone and fibrous connective tissue interface with endosteal dental implants.
    Steflik DE; McKinney RV; Sisk AL; Koth DL; Singh BB; Parr GR
    Scanning Microsc; 1990 Dec; 4(4):1039-47; discussion on 1047-8. PubMed ID: 2094004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osseointegration of Zirconia in the Presence of Multinucleated Giant Cells.
    Chappuis V; Cavusoglu Y; Gruber R; Kuchler U; Buser D; Bosshardt DD
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):686-98. PubMed ID: 26377587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative investigation in dogs: 2-year morphometric results of the dental implant--bone interface.
    Steflik DE; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Davis HC; Adams BO; Yavari J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 8820118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.