150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8850164)
1. Microleakage of direct and indirect inlay/onlay systems.
Hasanreĭsoğlu U; Sönmez H; Uçtaşli S; Wilson HJ
J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Jan; 23(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 8850164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings.
Karaağaclioğlu L; Zaimoğlu A; Akören AC
J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Sep; 19(5):457-69. PubMed ID: 1453258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. An in vitro comparison with the direct technique.
Milleding P
Acta Odontol Scand; 1992 Oct; 50(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 1441934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays.
Hasegawa EA; Boyer DB; Chan DC
Dent Mater; 1989 Nov; 5(6):388-91. PubMed ID: 2700973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
Piemjai M; Miyasaka K; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage studies comparing a one-visit indirect composite inlay system and a direct composite restorative technique.
Cassin AM; Pearson GJ
J Oral Rehabil; 1992 May; 19(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 1500970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Amalgam alternatives-microleakage evaluation of clinical procedures. Part II: direct/indirect composite inlay systems.
Ziskind D; Elbaz B; Hirschfeld Z; Rosen L
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jul; 25(7):502-6. PubMed ID: 9722096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gingival seal of deep Class II direct and indirect composite restorations.
Kenyon BJ; Frederickson D; Hagge MS
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 17380801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal fit and microleakage of indirect inlay systems.
Reid JS; Saunders WP; Baidas KM
Am J Dent; 1993 Apr; 6(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 8397988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptability and microleakage of indirect resin inlays: an in vivo investigation.
Ferrari M; Mason PN
Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):861-5. PubMed ID: 20830881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of occlusal finish line configuration on microleakage of indirect composite inlays.
Peixoto RT; Poletto LT; Lanza MD; Buono VT
J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 12236643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of finishing time on the marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified resin composite.
Lim CC; Neo J; Yap A
J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 10080324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
Smith ED; Martin FE
Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the internal conditioning of indirect restorations of resin composite in relation to microleakage using LEDs and QTH units.
Calabrez-Filho S; Calabrez VC; Reston EG; de Andrade MF; Borges LH
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 19544818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage at gingival dentin margins of Class V composite restorations lined with light-cured glass ionomer cement.
Tjan AH; Dunn JR
J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Dec; 121(6):706-10. PubMed ID: 2277155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
