BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8850665)

  • 1. Multiple emboli and filter function: an in vitro comparison of three vena cava filters.
    Xian ZY; Roy S; Hosaka J; Kvernebo K; Laerum F
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 8850665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporary inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison with permanent IVC filters.
    Stoneham GW; Burbridge BE; Millward SF
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 8541676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison of Günther Tulip and Celect filters: testing filtering efficiency and pressure drop.
    Nicolas M; Malvé M; Peña E; Martínez MA; Leask R
    J Biomech; 2015 Feb; 48(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25553669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New optional IVC filter for percutaneous retrieval--in vitro evaluation of embolus capturing efficiency.
    Günther RW; Neuerburg J; Mossdorf A; Pfeffer J; Høj AR; Mølgaard-Nielsen A; Bücker A; Schmitz-Rode T
    Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 15871077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro study of guide wire entrapment in currently available inferior vena cava filters.
    Stavropoulos SW; Itkin M; Trerotola SO
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Jul; 14(7):905-10. PubMed ID: 12847198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clover leaf inferior vena cava filter: in vitro evaluation of filter deployment and comparison of emboli-capturing ability.
    Palestrant AM; Faykus MH
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1991 Feb; 2(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 1799740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of clinically available inferior vena cava filters with an in vitro physiologic simulation of the vena cava.
    Simon M; Rabkin DJ; Kleshinski S; Kim D; Ransil BJ
    Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 8234702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro flow phantom analysis and clot-capturing ability of incompletely opened Vena Tech-LGM vena caval filters.
    Korbin CD; Reed RA; Taylor FC; Kokoris SP; Teitelbaum GP
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1993; 16(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8435832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro function of an adjustable temporary venous spring filter: comparison with the temporary RF02 filter and the permanent Greenfield vena cava filter.
    Hosaka J; Roy S; Kvernebo K; Enge I; Laerum F
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5(9):620-5. PubMed ID: 9750891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strut interlocking of titanium Greenfield vena cava filters and its effect on clot capturing: an in vitro study.
    Korbin CD; Van Allan RJ; Andrews RT; Katz MD; Teitelbaum GP
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1994; 17(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 7954574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of a new temporary venous filter: the Spring filter.
    Xian ZY; Roy S; Hosaka J; Kuroki K; Kvernebo K; Enge I; Laerum F
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1995; 18(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison of clot trapping and flow dynamics.
    Katsamouris AA; Waltman AC; Delichatsios MA; Athanasoulis CA
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 3336712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro and in vivo experimental evaluation of a new vena caval filter.
    Qian Z; Yasui K; Nazarian GK; Vlodaver Z; Hunter DW; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8054757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerical analysis of the hemodynamics and embolus capture of a greenfield vena cava filter.
    Swaminathan TN; Hu HH; Patel AA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 16706585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro evaluation of vena cava filters.
    Hammer FD; Rousseau HP; Joffre FG; Sentenac BP; Tran-Van T; Barthelemy RP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(6):869-76. PubMed ID: 7873867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thrombus-trapping efficiency of the LGM (Vena Tech) and titanium Greenfield filters in vivo.
    Millward SF; Marsh JI; Pon C; Moher D
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Feb; 3(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 1540709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro studies of temporary vena cava filters.
    Lorch H; Zwaan M; Kulke C; Weiss HD
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1998; 21(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 9502683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of filters in an oversized vena caval phantom: intracaval placement of a bird's nest filter versus biiliac placement of Greenfield, Vena Tech-LGM, and Simon nitinol filters.
    Korbin CD; Reed RA; Taylor FC; Pentecost MJ; Teitelbaum GP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Aug; 3(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1515730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a spiral nitinol temporary inferior vena caval filter.
    Stecker MS; Barnhart WH; Lang EV
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Jun; 8(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 11394541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro evaluation of clot capture efficiency of an absorbable vena cava filter.
    Dria SJ; Eggers MD
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2016 Oct; 4(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 27639002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.