These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8850665)

  • 21. Comparison of the in vitro clot-capturing efficiencies of commercially available retrievable inferior vena cava filters.
    Zhao H; Zhang X; Tsauo J; Li J; Gong T; Sang M; Li X
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2022 Mar; 10(2):463-468.e2. PubMed ID: 34487891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retrievable IVC square stent filter: experimental study.
    Pavcnik D; Uchida BT; Keller FS; Corless CL; Rösch J
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1999; 22(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 10382057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vivo evaluation of the adjustable temporary venous spring filter and the RF02 temporary filter: comparative study.
    Hosaka J; Roy S; Kvernebo K; Enge I; Laerum F
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Jun; 6(6):343-51. PubMed ID: 10376065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimal central trapping (OPCETRA) vena caval filter: results of experimental studies.
    Kraimps JL; De La Faye D; Drouineau J; Bensignor E; Barbier J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Nov; 3(4):697-701. PubMed ID: 1446131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retrievability of the Günther Tulip vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days in patients with multiple trauma.
    Rosenthal D; Wellons ED; Hancock SM; Burkett AB
    J Endovasc Ther; 2007 Jun; 14(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 17723017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adjustable temporary venous spring filter: in vitro assessment.
    Hosaka J; Roy S; Kvernebo K; Enge I; Laerum F
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Jul; 4(7):513-8. PubMed ID: 9232172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A novel deployment design of vena cava filters might be the solution to their blockage problem.
    Chen Z; Fan Y; Deng X
    Med Hypotheses; 2011 Dec; 77(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 21903340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro evaluation of optionally retrievable and permanent IVC filters.
    Mahnken AH; Pfeffer J; Stanzel S; Mossdorf A; Günther RW; Schmitz-Rode T
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Jul; 42(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 17568276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro evaluation of caval filters.
    Robinson JD; Madison MT; Hunter DW; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1988 Dec; 11(6):346-51. PubMed ID: 3145810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inferior vena cava filters. Indications, safety, effectiveness.
    Becker DM; Philbrick JT; Selby JB
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Oct; 152(10):1985-94. PubMed ID: 1417371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Role of prophylactic temporary inferior vena cava filters placed at the ICU bedside under intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients with multiple trauma.
    Rosenthal D; Wellons ED; Levitt AB; Shuler FW; O'Conner RE; Henderson VJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Nov; 40(5):958-64. PubMed ID: 15557911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Complications of Celect, Günther tulip, and Greenfield inferior vena cava filters on CT follow-up: a single-institution experience.
    McLoney ED; Krishnasamy VP; Castle JC; Yang X; Guy G
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1723-9. PubMed ID: 24041915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A large embolus trapped by an inferior vena cava filter: a case report supporting inferior vena cava filter insertion.
    Tada H; Hayashi N; Miyamori I
    Int J Cardiol; 1998 May; 64(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 9672412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of retrievable compared to permanent inferior vena cava filters: a single-institution experience.
    Van Ha TG; Chien AS; Funaki BS; Lorenz J; Piano G; Shen M; Leef J
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(2):308-15. PubMed ID: 17955289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical comparison of two optional vena cava filters.
    Keller IS; Meier C; Pfiffner R; Keller E; Pfammatter T
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 17446541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extended interval for retrieval of Günther Tulip filters.
    Terhaar OA; Lyon SM; Given MF; Foster AE; Mc Grath F; Lee MJ
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1257-62. PubMed ID: 15525745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro evaluation of a retrievable low-profile nitinol vena cava filter.
    Bruckheimer E; Judelman AG; Bruckheimer SD; Tavori I; Naor G; Katzen BT
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Apr; 14(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 12682203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optional inferior vena cava filter retrieval with retained thrombus: an in vitro model.
    Kolbeck KJ; Itkin M; Cheatham L; Stavropoulos SW
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Apr; 17(4):685-91. PubMed ID: 16614152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro assessment of the hemodynamic effects of a partial occlusion in a vena cava filter.
    Couch GG; Kim H; Ojha M
    J Vasc Surg; 1997 Apr; 25(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 9129622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Günther Tulip and Celect IVC filters in multiple-trauma patients.
    Rosenthal D; Kochupura PV; Wellons ED; Burkett AB; Methodius-Rayford WC
    J Endovasc Ther; 2009 Aug; 16(4):494-9. PubMed ID: 19702346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.