These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
31. The re-use of previously implanted pacemakers. Havia T; Schüller H Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Suppl; 1978; (22):33-4. PubMed ID: 102026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [A contribution for the selection of cardiac pacemakers with different batteries (author's transl)]. Irnich W; Gebhardt U; Effert S Biomed Tech (Berl); 1977 May; 22(5):106-14. PubMed ID: 922105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Radiation protection and cardiac pacemakers with radionuclide batteries]. Stieve FE Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1976; 15():178-91. PubMed ID: 936229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Status of technical development of artificial pacemakers]. Wirtzfeld A; Himmler C Internist (Berl); 1977 Jan; 18(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 320141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Domiciliary control of patients with pacemakers]. Meciani L MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1977 Dec; 119(51-52):1675-6. PubMed ID: 414106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. What future for nuclear-powered pacemakers? Gunby P JAMA; 1979 Feb; 241(5):439. PubMed ID: 759658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison between mercury and lithium chemical systems for pacemaker energy source applications. Mosharrafa M Biomed Sci Instrum; 1975; 11():157-61. PubMed ID: 1125369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The present status of cardiac pacing. Furman S Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1976 Oct; 143(4):645-59. PubMed ID: 959983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Discrepancies between the theoretical optimal substitution time and criteria for elective substitution of mercury batteries]. Rognoni G; D'Aulerio M; Gronda M; Rossi P G Ital Cardiol; 1978; 8 Suppl 3():155. PubMed ID: 755754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]