These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 885158)

  • 1. Amphetamine discrimination as a test for anti-parkinsonism drugs.
    Schechter MD
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1977 Jul; 44(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 885158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different dopaminergic mechanisms for amfonelic acid, amphetamine and apomorphine.
    Schechter MD
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1980 Oct; 13(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 7433481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of dopamine in d-amphetamine-induced discriminative responding.
    Ho BT; Huang JT
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1975; 3(6):1085-92. PubMed ID: 1223898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of behavioral effects of cathinone, amphetamine and apomorphine.
    Schechter MD; Rosecrans JA; Glennon RA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1984 Feb; 20(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 6718445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pharmacological analysis of the apomorphine discriminative stimulus in rhesus monkeys.
    Woolverton WL; Kamien JB; Goldberg LI
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1987 Apr; 241(1):213-7. PubMed ID: 3553538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amphetamine- type reinforcement by dopaminergic agonists in the rat.
    Yokel RA; Wise RA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1978 Jul; 58(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 98800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A pharmacological analysis of the discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine in rhesus monkeys.
    Kamien JB; Woolverton WL
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1989 Mar; 248(3):938-46. PubMed ID: 2649658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of d-amphetamine, morphine, naloxone, and drug combinations on visual discrimination in rats.
    Andrews JS; Holtzman SG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 94(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 3127842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus properties of d-amphetamine as compared to l-amphetamine.
    Schechter MD
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1978 Feb; 47(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 631192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discriminative stimulus effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and diazepam in humans.
    Heishman SJ; Henningfield JE
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1991; 103(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 2062984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of training dose on the relationship between discriminative-stimulus and self-reported drug effects of d-amphetamine in humans.
    Kollins SH; Rush CR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Oct; 64(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 10515308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of d-amphetamine and caffeine in humans under a cocaine discrimination procedure.
    Oliveto AH; McCance-Katz E; Singha A; Hameedi F; Kosten TR
    Behav Pharmacol; 1998 May; 9(3):207-17. PubMed ID: 9832935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paroxetine, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake inhibitor with antidepressant properties, lacks amphetamine-like stimulus properties in an operant drug discrimination bioassay in rodents.
    Goudie AJ; Dubicki W; Leathley M
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 1988 Mar; 40(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 2899149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discriminative stimulus effects of caffeine and benzphetamine in amphetamine-trained volunteers.
    Chait LD; Johanson CE
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 96(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 3146764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Haloperidol-induced supersensitivity to the discrimination of apomorphine.
    Schechter MD
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1981 Sep; 74(4):343-6. PubMed ID: 7297600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Similar discriminative-stimulus effects of D-amphetamine in women and men.
    Vansickel AR; Lile JA; Stoops WW; Rush CR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2007; 87(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 17561238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discriminative stimulus and self-reported effects of methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and triazolam in methylphenidate-trained humans.
    Stoops WW; Lile JA; Glaser PE; Rush CR
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2005 Feb; 13(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 15727504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lack of blockade of central dopaminergic receptors by narcotics: comparison with chlorpromazine.
    Schechter MD
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1978 Jun; 49(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 658141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The 5-HT3 receptor partial agonist MD-354 (meta-chlorophenylguanidine) enhances the discriminative stimulus actions of (+)amphetamine in rats.
    Dukat M; Wesolowska A; Young R; Glennon RA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2007; 87(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 17540440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Serotonergic influence on the potentiation of D-amphetamine and apomorphine-induced rotational behavior by the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist 2-methoxy idazoxan in hemiparkinsonian rats.
    Srinivasan J; Schmidt WJ
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2005 Sep; 112(9):1223-36. PubMed ID: 15614426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.