These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8851776)

  • 1. Effect of background scene complexity and field dependence on the legibility of head-up displays for automotive applications.
    Ward NJ; Parkes A; Crone PR
    Hum Factors; 1995 Dec; 37(4):735-45. PubMed ID: 8851776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of cognition and age on accommodation, detection rate and response times when using a car head-up display (HUD).
    Wolffsohn JS; McBrien NA; Edgar GK; Stout T
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 May; 18(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 9829111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of a simulated head-up display speedometer on perceptual task performance.
    Sojourner RJ; Antin JF
    Hum Factors; 1990 Jun; 32(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 2258179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automotive HUDs: the overlooked safety issues.
    Tufano DR
    Hum Factors; 1997 Jun; 39(2):303-11. PubMed ID: 9302890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Head-up displays and their automotive application: an overview of human factors issues affecting safety.
    Ward NJ; Parkes A
    Accid Anal Prev; 1994 Dec; 26(6):703-17. PubMed ID: 7857487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional requirements of automotive head-up displays: A systematic review of literature from 1994 to present.
    Park J; Park W
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Apr; 76():130-146. PubMed ID: 30642518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of three helmet-mounted display symbologies on unusual attitude recognition and recovery.
    Ercoline WR; Self BP; Matthews RS
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1053-8. PubMed ID: 12433226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of color combinations on the legibility of text presented on LCDs.
    Humar I; Gradisar M; Turk T; Erjavec J
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1510-7. PubMed ID: 24874503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual search and segregation as a function of display complexity.
    Scharroo J; Stalmeier PF; Boselie F
    J Gen Psychol; 1994 Jan; 121(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 8021632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pathway HUDs: are they viable?
    Fadden S; Ververs PM; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):173-93. PubMed ID: 11592660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priming of simple and complex scene layout: rapid function from the intermediate level.
    Sanocki T; Sulman N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):735-49. PubMed ID: 19485688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does display configuration affect information sampling performance?
    Brand JL; Orenstein HB
    Ergonomics; 1998 Mar; 41(3):286-301. PubMed ID: 9520626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment model for perceived visual complexity of automotive instrument cluster.
    Yoon SH; Lim J; Ji YG
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Jan; 46 Pt A():76-83. PubMed ID: 25130311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multidimensional measure of display clutter and pilot performance for advanced head-up display.
    Kim SH; Prinzel LJ; Kaber DB; Alexander AL; Stelzer EM; Kaufmann K; Veil T
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2011 Nov; 82(11):1013-22. PubMed ID: 22097635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhanced perception and performance by multimodal threat cueing in simulated combat vehicle.
    Oskarsson PA; Eriksson L; Carlander O
    Hum Factors; 2012 Feb; 54(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 22409107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of visual crowding, text size, and positional uncertainty on text legibility at a glance.
    Dobres J; Wolfe B; Chahine N; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():240-246. PubMed ID: 29866314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A user study of auditory, head-up and multi-modal displays in vehicles.
    Jakus G; Dicke C; Sodnik J
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Jan; 46 Pt A():184-92. PubMed ID: 25151313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-level aftereffects to global scene properties.
    Greene MR; Oliva A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1430-42. PubMed ID: 20731502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted.
    Asch SE; Witkin HA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Dec; 121(4):407-18; discussion 404-6. PubMed ID: 1431735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of information localization in scene gist recognition.
    Loschky LC; Sethi A; Simons DJ; Pydimarri TN; Ochs D; Corbeille JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1431-50. PubMed ID: 18085955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.