These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8852317)

  • 21. An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    J Biomech; 1995 Nov; 28(11):1309-17. PubMed ID: 8522544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A functional subdivision of hip, abdominal, and back muscles during asymmetric lifting.
    Danneels LA; Vanderstraeten GG; Cambier DC; Witvrouw EE; Stevens VK; De Cuyper HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(6):E114-21. PubMed ID: 11246393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals.
    Schultz A; Andersson G; Ortengren R; Haderspeck K; Nachemson A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1982 Jun; 64(5):713-20. PubMed ID: 7085696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanically determined hand force limits protecting the low back during occupational pushing and pulling tasks.
    Weston EB; Aurand A; Dufour JS; Knapik GG; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2018 Jun; 61(6):853-865. PubMed ID: 29241415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Active trunk stiffness during voluntary isometric flexion and extension exertions.
    Lee PJ; Granata KP; Moorhouse KM
    Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 17315847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A biologically-assisted curved muscle model of the lumbar spine: Model validation.
    Hwang J; Knapik GG; Dufour JS; Best TM; Khan SN; Mendel E; Marras WS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2016 Aug; 37():153-159. PubMed ID: 27484459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitivity of single-equivalent trunk extensor muscle models to anatomical and functional assumptions.
    van Dieën JH; de Looze MP
    J Biomech; 1999 Feb; 32(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 10052926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trunk strength, muscle activity and spinal loads in maximum isometric flexion and extension exertions: a combined in vivo-computational study.
    El Ouaaid Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2228-35. PubMed ID: 23871523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Elevation and orientation of external loads influence trunk neuromuscular response and spinal forces despite identical moments at the L5-S1 level.
    El Ouaaid Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):3035-42. PubMed ID: 25065729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identification of dynamic myoelectric signal-to-force models during isometric lumbar muscle contractions.
    Thelen DG; Schultz AB; Fassois SD; Ashton-Miller JA
    J Biomech; 1994 Jul; 27(7):907-19. PubMed ID: 8063841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Offering proper feedback to control for out-of-plane lumbar moments influences the activity of trunk muscles during unidirectional isometric trunk exertions.
    Larivière C; Gagnon D; Genest K
    J Biomech; 2009 Jul; 42(10):1498-1505. PubMed ID: 19446296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The biomechanical effects of variation in the maximum forces exerted by trunk muscles on the joint forces and moments in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Kim K; Lee SK; Kim YH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010 Oct; 224(10):1165-74. PubMed ID: 21138234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of a lifting belt on spine moments and muscle recruitments after unexpected sudden loading.
    Lavender SA; Shakeel K; Andersson GB; Thomas JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun; 25(12):1569-78. PubMed ID: 10851108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Trunk response and stability in standing under sagittal-symmetric pull-push forces at different orientations, elevations and magnitudes.
    El Ouaaid Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():166-174. PubMed ID: 29089111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation of a personalized curved muscle model of the lumbar spine during complex dynamic exertions.
    Hwang J; Knapik GG; Dufour JS; Best TM; Khan SN; Mendel E; Marras WS
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2017 Apr; 33():1-9. PubMed ID: 28107658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electromyographic activity of the abdominal and low back musculature during the generation of isometric and dynamic axial trunk torque: implications for lumbar mechanics.
    McGill SM
    J Orthop Res; 1991 Jan; 9(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 1824571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine.
    McGill S; Juker D; Kropf P
    J Biomech; 1996 Nov; 29(11):1503-7. PubMed ID: 8894932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of variation in external pulling force magnitude, elevation, and orientation on trunk muscle forces, spinal loads and stability.
    El Ouaaid Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):946-952. PubMed ID: 26475220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intramuscular myoelectric activity and selective coactivation of trunk muscles during lateral flexion with and without load.
    Huang QM; Andersson E; Thorstensson A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(13):1465-72. PubMed ID: 11458152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.