206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8853029)
1. Statement on technical devices for innovation in cervical cytology screening.
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Oct; 106(4):441. PubMed ID: 8853029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer.
Linder J
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A Groundbreaking Work Which Laid the Foundation for Mass Screening in Cervical Cytology in Japan.
Osamura RY
Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(4-5):299-304. PubMed ID: 28693014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Problems with audit in cervical cytology.
Womack C; Warren AY
Cytopathology; 2000 Jun; 11(3):200-1. PubMed ID: 10877284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical cytology in Zambia.
Grech ES; O'Dowd MJ; Tsirkina GA; Zeigler O
Med J Zambia; 1977; 11(4):112-7. PubMed ID: 919781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based medicine--in real time. Comparing methods of cervical Ca screening.
Genova NJ
JAAPA; 2000 Jan; 13(1):55-6, 59-60, 63. PubMed ID: 11503224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?
Linder J
Cytopathology; 2002 Feb; 13(1):66. PubMed ID: 11985572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cytology screening in HIV-positive women: completion of the audit cycle.
Bates SM; Street EJ
Int J STD AIDS; 2011 Oct; 22(10):615-6. PubMed ID: 21998191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of different sampling techniques on smear quality and the diagnosis of cytological abnormalities in cervical screening.
Williamson SL; Hair T; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 9202894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Managing incidents in the cervical screening programme.
Wilkinson MJ
Cytopathology; 2000 Oct; 11(5):287-9. PubMed ID: 11014655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of two simultaneously obtained cervical cytological smears.
Sedlis A; Walters AT; Balin H; Hontz A; Lo Sciuto L
Acta Cytol; 1974; 18(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 4526248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.
Mitchell H; Medley G
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Bethesda system and Pap smear screening.
Miller K
Am Fam Physician; 1995 Feb; 51(2):331-2. PubMed ID: 7840027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. HPV testing in cervical cytology practice: it's all about choice.
Stoler MH
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 15839612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality control in cervical cytology.
Husain OA; Butler EB; Evans DM; Macgregor JE; Yule R
J Clin Pathol; 1974 Dec; 27(12):935-44. PubMed ID: 4141708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DIY smear tests: are they the answer to falling cervical screening rates?
Wise J
BMJ; 2019 Jan; 364():l361. PubMed ID: 30674464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Too early to solve Pap device puzzle.
Check W
CAP Today; 1997 Jun; 11(6):1, 44-6, 48-9 passim. PubMed ID: 10174227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review.
Payne N; Chilcott J; McGoogan E
Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(18):1-73. PubMed ID: 10932023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Introduction to and update of "cost effectiveness in new technology in cervix cancer screening".
Robinowitz M
Epidemiology; 2002 May; 13 Suppl 3():S23-5. PubMed ID: 12071479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. ASC statement on new technologies in cervical cytology screening (June 2000). American Society of Cytopathology.
Rosenthal DL;
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Dec; 23(6):430. PubMed ID: 11074653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
