These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8854194)

  • 1. Clinical profile of ioversol. A metaanalysis of 57 randomized, double-blind clinical trials.
    Floriani I; Ciceri M; Torri V; Tinazzi A; Jahn H; Noseda A
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Aug; 31(8):479-91. PubMed ID: 8854194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary European intravenous clinical experience with a new, low osmolar, nonionic contrast medium: ioversol (Optiray).
    Le Mignon MM; Azau C; Arthaud A; Bonnemain B
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 1743190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discomfort assessment in peripheral angiography: randomized clinical trial of Iodixanol 270 versus Ioversol 320 in diabetics with critical limb ischemia.
    Palena LM; Sacco ZD; Brigato C; Sultato E; Barra D; Candeo A; Manzi M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1019-25. PubMed ID: 24478190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ioversol in ascending phlebography--a clinical trial.
    Scott H; Palmer FJ
    Australas Radiol; 1990 Feb; 34(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 2192700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ioversol in intravenous excretory urography. Evaluation of radiographic quality, patient tolerance and safety in four clinical studies.
    Jahn H; Müller-Späth R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):297-302. PubMed ID: 1296496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ascending lower limb phlebography: comparison of ioversol and iothalamate meglumine.
    Wilson AJ; Murphy WA; Destouet JM; Gilula LA; Hardy DC; Monsees B; Totty WG
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1989 Jun; 40(3):142-4. PubMed ID: 2660958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ioversol for intravenous urography: a comparison study.
    Kaufman AJ; Concepcion R; Kirchner FK; McDougal WS; Winfield AC
    Urol Radiol; 1990; 12(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 2333674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of clinical tolerability and diagnostic efficacy of ioversol 350 in UIV. A randomized double-blind study of ioversol 350 versus iohexol 350].
    Voegeli E; Woessmer B
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):293-6. PubMed ID: 1296495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical summary of initial intravenous administration of ioversol.
    McClennan BL
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S43-6. PubMed ID: 2687195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ioversol in intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Miller FJ; Pollei SR; Osborn AG
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S52-4. PubMed ID: 2687197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A double-blind comparative study on the contrast quality, tolerance and safety of ioversol 300 versus iohexol 300 in central venous angiography (C.V. DSA).
    Rieser R; Beinborn W; Ney N
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):311-4. PubMed ID: 1296499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ioversol clinical safety summary.
    Benamor M; Aten EM; McElvany KD; Lankin DG; James MA; Buy-Gandal T; Harashe LT; Weinandt WJ
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S67-72. PubMed ID: 2687200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An observational study to evaluate the efficiency and safety of ioversol pre-filled syringes compared with ioversol bottles in contrast-enhanced examinations.
    Vogl TJ; Wessling J; Buerke B
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Oct; 53(8):914-20. PubMed ID: 22983259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the radiographic efficacy of iomeprol.
    Kozuka T; Katayama H; Ebata K
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S109-14. PubMed ID: 8020512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Double-blind randomized study comparing ioversol 300 versus iopromide 300 abdominal computed tomography (CT scanner)].
    Hoogewoud HM; Neiss AC; Woessmer B
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):273-5. PubMed ID: 1296490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A double blind clinical study comparing the safety, tolerance and efficacy of ioversol 240 and iohexol 240 (Omnipaque 240) in ascending venography.
    Wilkins RA; Spinks BC
    Clin Radiol; 1990 Apr; 41(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 2187651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
    Goldberg SN; Abrahams J; Drayer BP; Golding S; Bernardino M; Brunetti J
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S76-83; discussion S93. PubMed ID: 8071050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unequal doses of ioversol versus diatrizoate for urography.
    Baker MK; Kopecky KK; Bogan M; Wass JL
    Urol Radiol; 1990; 12(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 2281582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computed body tomography with a new nonionic contrast agent. Comparison of ioversol with sodium/meglumine diatrizoate.
    McClennan BL; Heiken JP; Lee JK; James MA
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S35-8. PubMed ID: 2687193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A double-blind study comparing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ioversol 320 and iopamidol-300 in cerebral angiography.
    Ringel K; Kuehn J
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S48-51. PubMed ID: 2687196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.