86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8854199)
1. Can we optimize our angiographic views every time? Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of a new functionality.
Finet G; Masquet C; Eifferman A; Funck F; Lefèvre T; Marco J; Amiel M; Beaune J; Liénard J
Invest Radiol; 1996 Aug; 31(8):523-31. PubMed ID: 8854199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Optimization of coronary angiographic views. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of a new system].
Finet G; Liénard J; Masquet C; Eifferman A; Funck F; Lefèvre T; Marco J; Amiel M; Beaune J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1996 Dec; 89(12):1617-25. PubMed ID: 9137727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coronary x-ray angiographic reconstruction and image orientation.
Sprague K; Drangova M; Lehmann G; Slomka P; Levin D; Chow B; deKemp R
Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):707-18. PubMed ID: 16878574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views.
Green NE; Chen SY; Hansgen AR; Messenger JC; Groves BM; Carroll JD
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Apr; 64(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 15744720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3-D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization.
Chen SJ; Carroll JD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Apr; 19(4):318-36. PubMed ID: 10909927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive approach to accurate analysis of small-diameter vessels in cineangiograms.
Sonka M; Reddy GK; Winniford MD; Collins SM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Feb; 16(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 9050411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Angle-independent measure of motion for image-based gating in 3D coronary angiography.
Lehmann GC; Holdsworth DW; Drangova M
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1311-20. PubMed ID: 16752566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients.
Messenger JC; Chen SY; Carroll JD; Burchenal JE; Kioussopoulos K; Groves BM
Int J Card Imaging; 2000 Dec; 16(6):413-27. PubMed ID: 11482706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Viewpoint planning for quantitative coronary angiography.
Preuhs A; Berger M; Bauer S; Redel T; Unberath M; Achenbach S; Maier A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Aug; 13(8):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 29858733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronary artery stenoses: assessment with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and axial reconstructions.
Reddy GP; Chernoff DM; Adams JR; Higgins CB
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 9646809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of sharpening filter on vessel diameter measured by quantitative coronary arteriography].
Arai H; Hosonuma N; Gou M; Ueno T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 May; 58(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 12520240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Maeng M; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative coronary angiography with deformable spline models.
Klein AK; Lee F; Amini AA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):468-82. PubMed ID: 9368103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonrigid registration-based coronary artery motion correction for cardiac computed tomography.
Bhagalia R; Pack JD; Miller JV; Iatrou M
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4245-54. PubMed ID: 22830758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suitability of the Cordis Stabilizer marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Koning G; Hekking E; Kemppainen JS; Richardson GA; Rothman MT; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 11246248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [An approach for segmentation of X-ray angiographic image based on region-growing and structure inferring].
Mei C; Wu G; Yang Y; Xie L; He J; Li S; Zhou S
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 31(2):413-20. PubMed ID: 25039152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining optimal acquisition parameters for computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of a software-assisted, breathhold exam simulation.
Engelken FJ; Lembcke A; Hamm B; Dewey M
Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 19124110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical feasibility of a fully automated 3D reconstruction of rotational coronary X-ray angiograms.
Neubauer AM; Garcia JA; Messenger JC; Hansis E; Kim MS; Klein AJ; Schoonenberg GA; Grass M; Carroll JD
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Feb; 3(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 20118152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative analysis of reconstructed 3-D coronary arterial tree and intracoronary devices.
Chen SY; Carroll JD; Messenger JC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jul; 21(7):724-40. PubMed ID: 12374311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A viewpoint determination system for stenosis diagnosis and quantification in coronary angiographic image acquisition.
Sato Y; Araki T; Hanayama M; Naito H; Tamura S
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Feb; 17(1):121-37. PubMed ID: 9617913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
