BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8854230)

  • 1. Factorial dose-response studies using frequency and magnitude of dose.
    Hafner KB; Ruberg SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 1996 Jul; 6(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 8854230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose response studies. II. Analysis and interpretation.
    Ruberg SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):15-42. PubMed ID: 7613559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose response studies. I. Some design considerations.
    Ruberg SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 7613556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New paradigm in dose-finding trials: patient-specific dosing and beyond phase I.
    Rogatko A; Babb JS; Tighiouart M; Khuri FR; Hudes G
    Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Aug; 11(15):5342-6. PubMed ID: 16061846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test and power considerations for multiple endpoint analyses using sequentially rejective graphical procedures.
    Bretz F; Maurer W; Hommel G
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1489-501. PubMed ID: 21290405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rationale and design of the enoximone clinical trials program.
    Lowes BD; Shakar SF; Metra M; Feldman AM; Eichhorn E; Freytag JW; Gerber MJ; Liard JF; Hartman C; Gorczynski R; Evans G; Linseman JV; Stewart J; Robertson AD; Roecker EB; Demets DL; Bristow MR
    J Card Fail; 2005 Dec; 11(9):659-69. PubMed ID: 16360960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality-of-life end points in cancer clinical trials: the U.S. Food and Drug Administration perspective.
    Beitz J; Gnecco C; Justice R
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1996; (20):7-9. PubMed ID: 8750460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiplicity adjustment for multiple endpoints in clinical trials with multiple doses of an active treatment.
    Quan H; Luo X; Capizzi T
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(14):2151-70. PubMed ID: 15909290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seamless Phase II/III combination study through response adaptive randomization.
    Wang L; Cui L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1177-87. PubMed ID: 18027224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Interim analyses].
    Kramar A; Paoletti X
    Bull Cancer; 2007 Nov; 94(11):965-74. PubMed ID: 18055314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying effective and/or safe doses by stepwise confidence intervals for ratios.
    Bretz F; Hothorn LA; Hsu JC
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):847-58. PubMed ID: 12627404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting the outcome of phase III trials using phase II data: a case study of clinical trial simulation in late stage drug development.
    De Ridder F
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 15733220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian design and analysis of two x two factorial clinical trials.
    Simon R; Freedman LS
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):456-64. PubMed ID: 9192445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An improved method of evaluating drug effect in a multiple dose clinical trial.
    Shen L
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1913-29. PubMed ID: 11427949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent versus sequential radiotherapy and tamoxifen in breast cancer - The CONSET trial is launched.
    Munshi A; Gupta D
    Acta Oncol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 20843175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patterns of treatment effects in subsets of patients in clinical trials.
    Bonetti M; Gelber RD
    Biostatistics; 2004 Jul; 5(3):465-81. PubMed ID: 15208206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical methods for active extension trials.
    Hu Z; Follmann D
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2433-48. PubMed ID: 17066400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design, analysis and presentation of factorial randomised controlled trials.
    Montgomery AA; Peters TJ; Little P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Nov; 3():26. PubMed ID: 14633287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological issues in the design of clinical trials for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: challenges and opportunities.
    Lienhardt C; Davies G
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2010 May; 14(5):528-37. PubMed ID: 20392344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Designs for efficient clinical trials.
    Simon R
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1989 Jul; 3(7):43-9; discussion 51-3. PubMed ID: 2701811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.