145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8854314)
1. Distal femoral fixation: a laboratory comparison of the 95 degrees plate, antegrade and retrograde inserted reamed intramedullary nails.
Koval KJ; Kummer FJ; Bharam S; Chen D; Halder S
J Orthop Trauma; 1996; 10(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 8854314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrograde intramedullary nails with distal screws locked to the nail have higher fatigue strength than locking plates in the treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures: A cadaver-based laboratory investigation.
Pekmezci M; McDonald E; Buckley J; Kandemir U
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jan; 96-B(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 24395321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Internal fixation of supracondylar femoral fractures: comparative biomechanical performance of the 95-degree blade plate and two retrograde nails.
Ito K; Grass R; Zwipp H
J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 9619461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Less Invasive Stabilization System Plate and Retrograde Intramedullary Nail in the Fixation of Femoral Supracondylar Fractures in the Elderly: A Biomechanical Study.
Du YR; Ma JX; Wang S; Sun L; Wang Y; Lu B; Bai HH; Hu YC; Ma XL
Orthop Surg; 2019 Apr; 11(2):311-317. PubMed ID: 30989797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of locked distal screws in retrograde nailing of osteoporotic distal femur fractures: a laboratory study using cadaver femurs.
Tejwani NC; Park S; Iesaka K; Kummer F
J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Jul; 19(6):380-3. PubMed ID: 16003196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immediate weight-bearing after treatment of a comminuted fracture of the femoral shaft with a statically locked intramedullary nail.
Brumback RJ; Toal TR; Murphy-Zane MS; Novak VP; Belkoff SM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Nov; 81(11):1538-44. PubMed ID: 10565645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of the standard condylar buttress plate, a locked buttress plate, and the 95-degree blade plate.
Koval KJ; Hoehl JJ; Kummer FJ; Simon JA
J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Oct; 11(7):521-4. PubMed ID: 9334954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanics of retrograde nail versus plate fixation for supracondylar femur fractures.
Firoozbakhsh K; Behzadi K; DeCoster TA; Moneim MS; Naraghi FF
J Orthop Trauma; 1995 Apr; 9(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 7776036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of concurrent fibular fracture on the fixation of distal tibia fractures: a laboratory comparison of intramedullary nails with locked plates.
Strauss EJ; Alfonso D; Kummer FJ; Egol KA; Tejwani NC
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Mar; 21(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 17473753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative biomechanical analysis of supracondylar femur fracture fixation: locked intramedullary nail versus 95-degree angled plate.
David SM; Harrow ME; Peindl RD; Frick SL; Kellam JF
J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Jul; 11(5):344-50. PubMed ID: 9294798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supplemental Fixation of Supracondylar Distal Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Dual-Plate and Plate-Nail Constructs.
Wright DJ; DeSanto DJ; McGarry MH; Lee TQ; Scolaro JA
J Orthop Trauma; 2020 Aug; 34(8):434-440. PubMed ID: 32032183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of interlocking nail constructs and double plating for fixation of diaphyseal femur fractures in immature horses.
Radcliffe RM; Lopez MJ; Turner TA; Watkins JP; Radcliffe CH; Markel MD
Vet Surg; 2001; 30(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 11230773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of retrograde nail, retrograde intramedullary nail, and prototype locking retrograde nail.
Heiney JP; Battula S; O'Connor JA; Ebraheim N; Schoenfeld AJ; Vrabec G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):692-6. PubMed ID: 22369968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A three-dimensional comparison of intramedullary nail constructs for osteopenic supracondylar femur fractures.
Paller DJ; Frenzen SW; Bartlett CS; Beardsley CL; Beynnon BD
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Feb; 27(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 22534687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical analysis of supracondylar femoral fractures fixed with modern retrograde intramedullary nails.
Hora N; Markel DC; Haynes A; Grimm MJ
J Orthop Trauma; 1999 Nov; 13(8):539-44. PubMed ID: 10714779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long Segment Blocking Screws Increase the Stability of Retrograde Nail Fixation in Geriatric Supracondylar Femur Fractures: Eliminating the "Bell-Clapper Effect".
Auston D; Donohue D; Stoops K; Cox J; Diaz M; Santoni B; Mir H
J Orthop Trauma; 2018 Nov; 32(11):559-564. PubMed ID: 30086037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distal femoral fractures in the elderly: biomechanical analysis of a polyaxial angle-stable locking plate versus a retrograde intramedullary nail in a human cadaveric bone model.
Bliemel C; Buecking B; Mueller T; Wack C; Koutras C; Beck T; Ruchholtz S; Zettl R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jan; 135(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 25388863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of fibular plate fixation on rotational stability of simulated distal tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.
Kumar A; Charlebois SJ; Cain EL; Smith RA; Daniels AU; Crates JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Apr; 85(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 12672833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
