These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8854662)

  • 1. Full reconstruction of Markov models on evolutionary trees: identifiability and consistency.
    Chang JT
    Math Biosci; 1996 Oct; 137(1):51-73. PubMed ID: 8854662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating trees from filtered data: identifiability of models for morphological phylogenetics.
    Allman ES; Holder MT; Rhodes JA
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 20004210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The identifiability of tree topology for phylogenetic models, including covarion and mixture models.
    Allman ES; Rhodes JA
    J Comput Biol; 2006 Jun; 13(5):1101-13. PubMed ID: 16796553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What can and what cannot be inferred from pairwise sequence comparisons?
    Baake E
    Math Biosci; 1998 Dec; 154(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 9990805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inconsistency of evolutionary tree topology reconstruction methods when substitution rates vary across characters.
    Chang JT
    Math Biosci; 1996 Jun; 134(2):189-215. PubMed ID: 8664540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifiability of two-tree mixtures for group-based models.
    Allman ES; Petrović S; Rhodes JA; Sullivant S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(3):710-22. PubMed ID: 20733238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do tree split probabilities determine the branch lengths?
    Chor B; Steel M
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Jun; 374():54-9. PubMed ID: 25843219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phylogeny of mixture models: robustness of maximum likelihood and non-identifiable distributions.
    Stefankovic D; Vigoda E
    J Comput Biol; 2007 Mar; 14(2):156-89. PubMed ID: 17456014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EM for phylogenetic topology reconstruction on nonhomogeneous data.
    Ibáñez-Marcelo E; Casanellas M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Jun; 14():132. PubMed ID: 24938507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phylogenetic mixtures and linear invariants for equal input models.
    Casanellas M; Steel M
    J Math Biol; 2017 Apr; 74(5):1107-1138. PubMed ID: 27604275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choosing the best ancestral character state reconstruction method.
    Royer-Carenzi M; Pontarotti P; Didier G
    Math Biosci; 2013 Mar; 242(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 23276531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifiability of the unrooted species tree topology under the coalescent model with time-reversible substitution processes, site-specific rate variation, and invariable sites.
    Chifman J; Kubatko L
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Jun; 374():35-47. PubMed ID: 25791286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Full reconstruction of non-stationary strand-symmetric models on rooted phylogenies.
    Kaehler BD
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():144-151. PubMed ID: 28286217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cases in which ancestral maximum likelihood will be confusingly misleading.
    Handelman T; Chor B
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():318-323. PubMed ID: 28263816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epidemic Reconstruction in a Phylogenetics Framework: Transmission Trees as Partitions of the Node Set.
    Hall M; Woolhouse M; Rambaut A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004613. PubMed ID: 26717515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parameter Identifiability for a Profile Mixture Model of Protein Evolution.
    Yourdkhani S; Allman ES; Rhodes JA
    J Comput Biol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):570-586. PubMed ID: 33960831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifiability of tree-child phylogenetic networks under a probabilistic recombination-mutation model of evolution.
    Francis A; Moulton V
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 446():160-167. PubMed ID: 29548737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting Character Dependencies in Stochastic Models of Evolution.
    Chakrabarty D; Kannan S; Tian K
    J Comput Biol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):180-91. PubMed ID: 26744770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method for inferring the rate of evolution of homologous characters that can potentially improve phylogenetic inference, resolve deep divergence and correct systematic biases.
    Cummins CA; McInerney JO
    Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 60(6):833-44. PubMed ID: 21804093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the convergence of the maximum likelihood estimator for the transition rate under a 2-state symmetric model.
    Ho LST; Dinh V; Matsen FA; Suchard MA
    J Math Biol; 2020 Mar; 80(4):1119-1138. PubMed ID: 31754778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.