These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8854747)

  • 1. Negative difference potential isolates scalp potentials generated by activity in supraspinal nociceptive pathways.
    Dowman R
    Psychophysiology; 1996 Sep; 33(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 8854747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of interstimulus interval on scalp topographies evoked by noxious sural nerve stimulation.
    Dowman R
    Psychophysiology; 1996 Jul; 33(4):398-408. PubMed ID: 8753940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human intracranially-recorded cortical responses evoked by painful electrical stimulation of the sural nerve.
    Dowman R; Darcey T; Barkan H; Thadani V; Roberts D
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jan; 34(2):743-63. PubMed ID: 17097306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence that the anterior cingulate and supplementary somatosensory cortices generate the pain-related negative difference potential.
    Dowman R; Schell S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2117-26. PubMed ID: 10616116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. II. Effects of stimulus intensity on topographic pattern and amplitude.
    Dowman R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jul; 92(4):303-15. PubMed ID: 7517852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interstimulus interval has no effect on a mid-latency scalp potential generated by innocuous-related activity in the primary somatosensory cortex.
    Dowman R
    Brain Topogr; 1997; 10(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 9455605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Innocuous-related sural nerve-evoked and finger-evoked potentials generated in the primary somatosensory and supplementary motor cortices.
    Dowman R; Schell S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2104-16. PubMed ID: 10616115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The pain-related negative difference potential: a direct measure of central pain pathway activity or of interactions between the innocuous somatosensory and pain pathways?
    Dowman R; Schell S
    Neurophysiol Clin; 1999 Oct; 29(5):423-42. PubMed ID: 10587952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spinal and supraspinal correlates of nociception in man.
    Dowman R
    Pain; 1991 Jun; 45(3):269-281. PubMed ID: 1876436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of a selective A beta afferent block on the pain-related SEP scalp topography.
    Dowman R; Bridgman PM
    Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 8829391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of reference sites for scalp potentials evoked by painful and non-painful sural nerve stimulation.
    Dowman R; Goshko L
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992; 84(6):477-85. PubMed ID: 1280193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Topographic analysis of painful laser and sural nerve electrical evoked potentials.
    Dowman R
    Brain Topogr; 2004; 16(3):169-79. PubMed ID: 15162914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of stimulus rate upon common peroneal, posterior tibial, and sural nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Onishi H; Yamada T; Saito T; Emori T; Fuchigami T; Hasegawa A; Nagaoka T; Ross M
    Neurology; 1991 Dec; 41(12):1972-7. PubMed ID: 1745357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences between primary somatosensory cortex- and vertex-derived somatosensory-evoked potentials in the rat.
    Stienen PJ; van den Brom WE; de Groot HN; Venker-van Haagen AJ; Hellebrekers LJ
    Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 1030(2):256-66. PubMed ID: 15571674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of the pain-evoked negative difference potential in dual-task response conflict.
    Dowman R
    Eur J Pain; 2004 Dec; 8(6):567-78. PubMed ID: 15531225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CO2 laser-induced pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials in peripheral neuropathies: correlation between electrophysiological and histopathological findings.
    Kakigi R; Shibasaki H; Tanaka K; Ikeda T; Oda K; Endo C; Ikeda A; Neshige R; Kuroda Y; Miyata K
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 May; 14(5):441-50. PubMed ID: 1651448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The gain of initial somatosensory evoked potentials alters with practice of an accurate motor task.
    Nelson AJ; Brooke JD; McIlroy WE; Bishop DC; Norrie RG
    Brain Res; 2001 Feb; 890(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 11164793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Somatosensory evoked potentials: morphology and interareal S1-M1 relationships in the baboon (Papio papio)].
    el Kharroussi M; Françon D; Ben Jelloun W; Hugon M
    Neurophysiol Clin; 1996; 26(5):279-99. PubMed ID: 9102564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of operantly conditioning the amplitude of the P200 peak of the SEP on pain sensitivity and the spinal nociceptive withdrawal reflex in humans.
    Dowman R
    Psychophysiology; 1996 May; 33(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 8936394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Somatosensory central conduction time after sural and tibial nerve stimulation.
    Delberghe X; Brunko E; Mavroudakis N; Zegers de Beyl D
    Acta Neurol Belg; 1994; 94(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 7839802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.