These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8854979)

  • 1. Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking.
    Van Winsum W; Heino A
    Ergonomics; 1996 Apr; 39(4):579-92. PubMed ID: 8854979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preferred time headway in car-following and individual differences in perceptual-motor skills.
    van Winsum W
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):863-73. PubMed ID: 9885050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time headway in car following and operational performance during unexpected braking.
    van Winsum W; Brouwer W
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 2):1247-57. PubMed ID: 9229443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of looming and attention capture in drivers' braking responses.
    Terry HR; Charlton SG; Perrone JA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1375-82. PubMed ID: 18606269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expectations while car following--the consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task.
    Muhrer E; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):2158-64. PubMed ID: 20728676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers' last-second braking and steering judgments.
    Kiefer RJ; LeBlanc DJ; Flannagan CA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 15667816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alcohol and highway crashes. Closing the gap between epidemiology and experimentation.
    Perrine MW
    Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry; 1976; 11():22-41. PubMed ID: 967165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a sudden brake warning system: effect on the response time of the following driver.
    Isler RB; Starkey NJ
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 20034608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pedestrian crossing situations: quantification of comfort boundaries to guide intervention timing.
    Lubbe N; Rosén E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Oct; 71():261-6. PubMed ID: 24956130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population distributions of time to collision at brake application during car following from naturalistic driving data.
    Kusano KD; Chen R; Montgomery J; Gabler HC
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():95-104. PubMed ID: 26403908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Driver headway: how close is too close on a motorway?
    Brackstone M; McDonald M
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1183-95. PubMed ID: 17558664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
    Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An improved automated braking system for rear-end collisions: A study based on a driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K; Yang J; Xue Q
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():416-427. PubMed ID: 35249623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimal study of young male drivers' responses to vehicle collision using EMG of lower extremity.
    Gao Z; Li C; Hu H; Zhao H; Chen C; Yu H
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S563-73. PubMed ID: 26406050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Braking from different speeds: judgments of collision speed if a car does not stop in time.
    Svenson O; Eriksson G; Gonzalez N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():487-92. PubMed ID: 22269533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Driver braking behavior analysis to improve autonomous emergency braking systems in typical Chinese vehicle-bicycle conflicts.
    Duan J; Li R; Hou L; Wang W; Li G; Li SE; Cheng B; Gao H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():74-82. PubMed ID: 28858775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responses to deceleration during car following: roles of optic flow, warnings, expectations, and interruptions.
    DeLucia PR; Tharanathan A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):334-50. PubMed ID: 20025419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation.
    Becker S; Brandenburg S; Thüring M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106725. PubMed ID: 35878555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.