224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8855483)
21. Proportional odds ratio model for comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis.
Siadaty MS; Shu J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Dec; 4(1):27. PubMed ID: 15588327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Semi-parametric ROC regression analysis with placement values.
Cai T
Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14744827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bayesian semi-parametric ROC analysis.
Erkanli A; Sung M; Costello EJ; Angold A
Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3905-28. PubMed ID: 16416403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of diagnostic markers by goodness-of-fit tests.
Nakas C; Yiannoutsos CT; Bosch RJ; Moyssiadis C
Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2503-13. PubMed ID: 12872305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves.
Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 21232682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
Qin G; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests.
Jiang Y; Metz CE; Nishikawa RM
Radiology; 1996 Dec; 201(3):745-50. PubMed ID: 8939225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of correlated receiver operating characteristic curves derived from repeated diagnostic test data.
Zou KH
Acad Radiol; 2001 Mar; 8(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 11249086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve: principles and application in biology].
Delacour H; Servonnet A; Perrot A; Vigezzi JF; Ramirez JM
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 15771972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data.
Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):438-47. PubMed ID: 10845403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Random-effects models in the receiver operating characteristic curve-based assessment of the effectiveness of diagnostic imaging technology: concepts, approaches, and issues.
Beam CA
Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():S4-13; discussion S57-60, S68-9 pas. PubMed ID: 9419700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A conditional nonparametric test for comparing two areas under the ROC curves from a paired design.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 15766688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.
Pepe MS
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9544511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
Drobatz KJ
J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.
Pepe MS; Cai T
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):528-35. PubMed ID: 15180681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
