117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8855484)
1. A method for determining the size of internal pilot studies.
Sandvik L; Erikssen J; Mowinckel P; Rødland EA
Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1587-90. PubMed ID: 8855484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies.
Hertzog MA
Res Nurs Health; 2008 Apr; 31(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 18183564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blinded sample size recalculation in multicentre trials with normally distributed outcome.
Jensen K; Kieser M
Biom J; 2010 Jun; 52(3):377-99. PubMed ID: 20394080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A SAS macro for sample size adjustment and randomization test for internal pilot study.
Wang S; Xia J; Yu L; Li C; Xu L
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Apr; 90(1):66-88. PubMed ID: 18192069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variance estimation in clinical studies with interim sample size re-estimation.
Miller F
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 16011681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The importance of piloting an RCT intervention.
Feeley N; Cossette S; Côté J; Héon M; Stremler R; Martorella G; Purden M
Can J Nurs Res; 2009 Jun; 41(2):85-99. PubMed ID: 19650515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blinded sample size reassessment in non-inferiority and equivalence trials.
Friede T; Kieser M
Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):995-1007. PubMed ID: 12627414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Blinded sample size re-estimation in superiority and noninferiority trials: bias versus variance in variance estimation.
Friede T; Kieser M
Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 23509095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials.
Borm GF; Fransen J; Lemmens WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1234-8. PubMed ID: 17998077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Power and sample size simulations for Randomized Play-the-Winner rules.
Guimaraes P; Palesch Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):487-99. PubMed ID: 17321219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How many do I need? Basic principles of sample size estimation.
Devane D; Begley CM; Clarke M
J Adv Nurs; 2004 Aug; 47(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 15238124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The design and interpretation of pilot trials in clinical research in critical care.
Arnold DM; Burns KE; Adhikari NK; Kho ME; Meade MO; Cook DJ;
Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1 Suppl):S69-74. PubMed ID: 19104228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study design VII. Randomised controlled trials.
Levin KA
Evid Based Dent; 2007; 8(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 17380181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials.
Lake S; Kammann E; Klar N; Betensky R
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1337-50. PubMed ID: 12185888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Co-bedding twins: how pilot study findings guided improvements in planning a larger multicenter trial.
Hayward K; Campbell-Yeo M; Price S; Morrison D; Whyte R; Cake H; Vine J
Nurs Res; 2007; 56(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 17356445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determining optimal sample sizes for multi-stage randomized clinical trials using value of information methods.
Willan A; Kowgier M
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 18697843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blinded sample size reestimation in non-inferiority trials with binary endpoints.
Friede T; Mitchell C; Müller-Velten G
Biom J; 2007 Dec; 49(6):903-16. PubMed ID: 17726715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36.
Walters SJ
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 May; 2():26. PubMed ID: 15161494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Composite outcomes in randomized clinical trials: arguments for and against.
Ross S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 196(2):119.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17306647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
