126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8856304)
1. Comparison of surgical and postoperative complications of vaginal hysterectomy and Manchester procedure.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Kalogirou O
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1996; 17(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 8856304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Manchester procedure vs. vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse. A comparison.
Thomas AG; Brodman ML; Dottino PR; Bodian C; Friedman F; Bogursky E
J Reprod Med; 1995 Apr; 40(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 7623360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.
Tolstrup CK; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 27485234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study.
Tolstrup CK; Husby KR; Lose G; Kopp TI; Viborg PH; Kesmodel US; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Mar; 29(3):431-440. PubMed ID: 29288346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques.
Husby KR; Larsen MD; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1887-1893. PubMed ID: 31053904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical amputation versus vaginal hysterectomy: a population-based register study.
Bergman I; Söderberg MW; Kjaeldgaard A; Ek M
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):257-266. PubMed ID: 27530518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy.
Antosh DD; High R; Brown HW; Oliphant SS; Abed H; Philip N; Grimes CL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):605.e1-605.e5. PubMed ID: 28734829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy at the University Hospital of the West Indies: a 5-year retrospective study.
DaCosta V; McIntosh A; Wynter S; Harriott J; Christie L; Frederick-Johnston S; Bailey M; Frederick J; McKenzie C
West Indian Med J; 2012 Dec; 61(9):865-9. PubMed ID: 24020225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy vs. Uterosacral Suspension for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Assessment.
Al-Badr A; Perveen K; Al-Shaikh G
Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2017 Jan; 9(1):33-37. PubMed ID: 28120442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vaginal versus Robotic Hysterectomy for Commonly Cited Relative Contraindications to Vaginal Hysterectomy.
Schmitt JJ; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Gebhart JB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 28689682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Döderlein-Krönig vaginal hysterectomy: an alternative to the traditional Heaney hysterectomy.
Stone DE; Malik SA; Doerhman P; Videla FL
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 May; 26(5):769-71. PubMed ID: 25503355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM].
Kovachev S; Ganovska A; Stankova T
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55 Suppl 1 Pt 1():4-10. PubMed ID: 27514161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Surgical treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse at the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of Kaunas University of Medicine].
Aniuliene R; Stankeviciene A; Kacerauskiene J; Aniulis P; Druktenyte V
Medicina (Kaunas); 2009; 45(6):440-6. PubMed ID: 19605963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged non-prolapse uterus using morcellation techniques and/or Deschamps needle: a retrospective cohort study].
Santos-López A; Gorbea-Chávez V; Rodríguez-Colorado S; Ramírez C; Torres-Valdéz E; Gámez-Guerrero P
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Mar; 83(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 26058167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Balci technique for suspending vaginal vault at vaginal hysterectomy with reduced risk of vaginal vault prolapse.
Balci O; Capar M; Acar A; Colakoglu MC
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Jul; 37(7):762-9. PubMed ID: 21395901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vaginal versus abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged non-prolapsed uterus: a retrospective cohort study.
Fatania K; Vithayathil M; Newbold P; Yoong W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Mar; 174():111-4. PubMed ID: 24412144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: an activity-based costing analysis.
Husby KR; Tolstrup CK; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1161-1171. PubMed ID: 29480429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature.
Dietz V; Schraffordt Koops SE; van der Vaart CH
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Mar; 20(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 19083135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fast track vaginal surgery.
Ottesen M; Sørensen M; Rasmussen Y; Smidt-Jensen S; Kehlet H; Ottesen B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Feb; 81(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 11942904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.
Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
