These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 885832)

  • 21. Effects of partial reinforcement and time between reinforced trials on terminal response rate in pigeon autoshaping.
    Gottlieb DA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 16413974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Extinction by retarded children following discrimination learning with and without errors.
    Lambert JL
    Am J Ment Defic; 1975 Nov; 80(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 1190268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is reinforcement necessary for the development of a generalized imitation operant in severely and profoundly retarded children?
    Bry PM; Nawas MM
    Am J Ment Defic; 1972 May; 76(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 5031087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Kahng SW; Iwata BA; Thompson RH; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):419-32. PubMed ID: 11214020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.
    Lie C; Harper DN; Hunt M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of rocking behavior.
    Hollis JH
    Monogr Am Assoc Ment Defic; 1978; (3):1-53. PubMed ID: 750911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensory reinforcement and contingency awareness of profoundly retarded children.
    Haskett J; Hollar WD
    Am J Ment Defic; 1978 Jul; 83(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 150231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of fixed-time reinforcement schedules on resurgence of problem behavior.
    Marsteller TM; St Peter CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):455-69. PubMed ID: 24844682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of vicarious reinforcement on attentive behavior in the classroom.
    Kazdin AE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1973; 6(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 16795397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: a demonstration of matching theory.
    Martens BK; Lochner DG; Kelly SQ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 1582963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modification of seizure disorders: the interruption of behavioral chains.
    Zlutnick S; Mayville WJ; Moffat S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1975; 8(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 1141076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Operant variability and voluntary action.
    Neuringer A; Jensen G
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):972-93. PubMed ID: 20658860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reduction of biting and chewing of horses using differential reinforcement of other behavior.
    Fox AE; Bailey SR; Hall EG; St Peter CC
    Behav Processes; 2012 Sep; 91(1):125-8. PubMed ID: 22617186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differential reinforcement of an approach response in zebrafish (Danio rerio).
    Manabe K; Dooling RJ; Takaku S
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():106-11. PubMed ID: 23727035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of nonretarded and mentally retarded children on tasks involving direct and rule-governed imitation.
    Boyce KD; Clinton L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 1272683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors.
    Horner RH; Day HM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(4):719-32. PubMed ID: 1839157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Aggression as a reinforcer: operant behavor in the mouse-killing rat.
    Van Hemel PE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Mar; 17(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 5062954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reducing time limits: a means to increase behavior of retardates.
    Ayllon T; Garber S; Pisor K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1976; 9(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 977515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.