181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8858537)
21. Important differences in clinical data from third, second, and first generation periodontal probes.
Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Johnson NW
J Periodontol; 1997 Apr; 68(4):335-45. PubMed ID: 9150038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Periodontal assessment by right- and left-handed examiners: is there a difference?
Khan SM; Blanchard SB; Dowsett SA; Eckert GJ; Kowolik MJ
J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1099-103. PubMed ID: 16805670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of manual and automated probing in an untreated periodontitis population.
Oringer RJ; Fiorellini JP; Koch GG; Sharp TJ; Nevins ML; Davis GH; Howell TH
J Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 68(12):1156-62. PubMed ID: 9444589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reproducibility and validity of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.
Eickholz P; Kim TS
J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 9579619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Option-4 algorithm for Florida pocket depth probe: reduction in the variance of site-specific probeable crevice depth measurements.
Breen HJ; Rogers P; Johnson NW; Slaney R
J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Aug; 26(8):511-8. PubMed ID: 10450811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Interexaminer reliability of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.
Eickholz P; Steinbrenner H; Lenhard M; Marquardt M; Holle R
Eur J Oral Sci; 1999 Feb; 107(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 10102744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement by an experimental periodontal probe incorporating optical fiber sensor.
Ishihata K; Wakabayashi N; Wadachi J; Akizuki T; Izumi Y; Takakuda K; Igarashi Y
J Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 21574830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of different manual periodontal probes on periodontal measurements.
Holtfreter B; Alte D; Schwahn C; Desvarieux M; Kocher T
J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 39(11):1032-41. PubMed ID: 22924328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reliability of direct and indirect clinical attachment level measurements.
Corraini P; Baelum V; Lopez R
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):896-905. PubMed ID: 23869826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of subgingival calculus on the validity of clinical probing measurements.
Clerehugh V; Abdeia R; Hull PS
J Dent; 1996 Sep; 24(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 8916646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reproducibility of automated periodontal probing around teeth and osseointegrated oral implants.
Christensen MM; Joss A; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):455-64. PubMed ID: 9555204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Periodontal probe precision using 4 different periodontal probes.
Mayfield L; Bratthall G; Attström R
J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Feb; 23(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 8849842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Site-specific attachment level change detected by physical probing in untreated chronic adult periodontitis: review of studies 1982-1997.
Breen HJ; Johnson NW; Rogers PA
J Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 70(3):312-28. PubMed ID: 10225549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A study of inter- and intra-examiner reliability of pocket depth and attachment level.
Fleiss JL; Mann J; Paik M; Goultchin J; Chilton NW
J Periodontal Res; 1991 Mar; 26(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 1826526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of periodontal and peri-implant probing by depth-force pattern analysis.
Mombelli A; Mühle T; Brägger U; Lang NP; Bürgin WB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):448-54. PubMed ID: 9555203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative reproducibility of proximal probing depth using electronic pressure-controlled and hand probing.
Mullally BH; Linden GJ
J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Apr; 21(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 8195446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The reliability of pocket probing around screw-type implants.
Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D; Jacobs R; Schotte A; Darius P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(4):186-92. PubMed ID: 8597621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro accuracy and reproducibility of automated and conventional periodontal probes.
Samuel ED; Griffiths GS; Petrie A
J Clin Periodontol; 1997 May; 24(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 9178114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of clinical experience on the accuracy of probing depth measurements.
Seabra RC; Costa FO; Costa JE; Van Dyke T; Soares RV
Quintessence Int; 2008; 39(7):559-65. PubMed ID: 19107263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Study design for calibration of clinical examiners measuring periodontal parameters.
Hill EG; Slate EH; Wiegand RE; Grossi SG; Salinas CF
J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1129-41. PubMed ID: 16805674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
