These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8858537)

  • 41. Reproducibility of attachment level recordings using an electronic and a conventional probe.
    Villata L; Baelum V
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1292-300. PubMed ID: 8997676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Constant force probing with and without a stent in untreated periodontal disease: the clinical reproducibility problem and possible sources of error.
    Watts T
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Aug; 14(7):407-11. PubMed ID: 3476518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Inter- and intra-examiner variability using standard and constant force periodontal probes.
    Walsh TF; Saxby MS
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Mar; 16(3):140-3. PubMed ID: 2723096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Comparative probing with an electronic and a manual periodontal probe].
    Becherer CF; Rateitschak KH; Hefti AF
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1993; 103(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 8322056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An investigation of the validity of attachment level measurements with an automated periodontal probe.
    Ahmed N; Watts TL; Wilson RF
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 May; 23(5):452-5. PubMed ID: 8783050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Option-4 algorithm for third generation disc probe: agreement of selected site-specific relative attachment level measurements and detection of longitudinal site-specific attachment level change.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10102553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparative evaluation of probing depth and clinical attachment level using a manual probe and Florida probe.
    Kour A; Kumar A; Puri K; Khatri M; Bansal M; Gupta G
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2016; 20(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 27563204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Level of patient comfort and measurement reproducibility of three different probes: A cross-sectional study.
    Flores-Rodrigo D; Meza-Mauricio J; Retamal-Valdes B; Mayta-Tovalino F; Mendoza-Azpur G
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2022 May; 20(2):301-307. PubMed ID: 34390316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical evaluation of electronic and manual constant force probes.
    Khocht A; Chang KM
    J Periodontol; 1998 Jan; 69(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 9527557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The influence of gingival health status on periodontal probing measurements. A clinical study in humans.
    Molina GO; Souza SL; Grisi MF; Novaes AB; Taba M
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 6(2):56-62. PubMed ID: 15125016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Periodontal probing depth measurement: a review.
    Khan S; Cabanilla LL
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2009; 30(1):12-4, 16, 18-21; quiz 22, 36. PubMed ID: 19263761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The reproducibility and validity of furcation measurements using a pressure-calibrated probe.
    Kim TS; Knittel M; Staehle HJ; Eickholz P
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Sep; 23(9):826-31. PubMed ID: 8891933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reproducibility of an electronic probe in relative attachment level measurements.
    Yang MC; Marks RG; Magnusson I; Clouser B; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):541-8. PubMed ID: 1447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An assessment of the validity of a constant force electronic probe in measuring probing depths.
    Hull PS; Clerehugh V; Ghassemi-Aval A
    J Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 66(10):848-51. PubMed ID: 8537866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical evaluation of a constant force electronic probe.
    Quirynen M; Callens A; van Steenberghe D; Nys M
    J Periodontol; 1993 Jan; 64(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8426288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Manual and electronic probing of the periodontal attachment level in untreated periodontitis: a systematic review.
    Silva-Boghossian CM; Amaral CS; Maia LC; Luiz RR; Colombo AP
    J Dent; 2008 Aug; 36(8):651-7. PubMed ID: 18534736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Prediction and diagnosis of attachment loss by enhanced chemiluminescent assay of crevicular fluid alkaline phosphatase levels.
    Chapple IL; Garner I; Saxby MS; Moscrop H; Matthews JB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 10100046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Measuring clinical attachment: reproducibility of relative measurements with an electronic probe.
    Clark WB; Yang MC; Magnusson I
    J Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 63(10):831-8. PubMed ID: 1403590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessing Effectiveness of an Audiovisual Educational Tool for Improving Dental Students' Probing Depth Consistency.
    Prabhu S; John V; Blanchard S; Eckert GJ; Hamada Y
    J Dent Educ; 2019 Apr; 83(4):429-436. PubMed ID: 30745343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Within-mouth correlations and reliabilities for probing depth and attachment level.
    Fleiss JL; Park MH; Chilton NW
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jul; 58(7):460-3. PubMed ID: 3476716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.