These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8858537)

  • 61. Evaluation of a new furcation stent as a fixed reference point for class II furcation measurements.
    Laxman VK; Khatri M; Devaraj CG; Reddy K; Reddy R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 19279968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The strategy and advantage in use of an electronic probe for attachment measurement.
    Clark WB; Magnusson I; Namgung YY; Yang MC
    Adv Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 7(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 8260002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Clinical evaluation of tine shape of 3 periodontal probes using 2 probing forces.
    Barendregt DS; Van der Velden U; Reiker J; Loos BG
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Apr; 23(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 8739173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Histological location of a standardized periodontal probe in man.
    Aguero A; Garnick JJ; Keagle J; Steflik DE; Thompson WO
    J Periodontol; 1995 Mar; 66(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 7776162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Probe penetration in relation to the connective tissue attachment level: influence of tine shape and probing force.
    Bulthuis HM; Barendregt DS; Timmerman MF; Loos BG; van der Velden U
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 May; 25(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 9650880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Intrasulcular laser Doppler readings before and after root planing.
    Hinrichs JE; Jarzembinski C; Hardie N; Aeppli D
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Nov; 22(11):817-23. PubMed ID: 8550856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Reproducibility of Probing Depth Measurements Using a Constant-Force Electronic Probe: Analysis of Inter- and Intraexaminer Variability.
    Araujo MWB; Benedek KM; Benedek JR; Grossi SG; Dorn J; Wactawski-Wende J; Genco RJ; Trevisan M
    J Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 74(12):1736-1740. PubMed ID: 29539079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Measurement of attachment level in clinical trials: probing methods.
    Pihlstrom BL
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12 Suppl):1072-7. PubMed ID: 1479528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The effect of different diagnostic thresholds on incidence of disease progression.
    Oringer RJ; Fiorellini JP; Reasner DS; Howell TH
    J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):872-8. PubMed ID: 9736369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparison of two automated periodontal probes and two probes with a conventional readout in periodontal maintenance patients.
    Barendregt DS; Van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; van der Weijden GA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Apr; 33(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 16553636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A clinical study of an electronic constant force periodontal probe.
    Tupta-Veselicky L; Famili P; Ceravolo FJ; Zullo T
    J Periodontol; 1994 Jun; 65(6):616-22. PubMed ID: 8083795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Reproducibility of Manual Periodontal Probing Following a Comprehensive Standardization and Calibration Training Program.
    Fitzgerald BP; Hawley CE; Harrold CQ; Garrett JS; Polson AM; Rams TE
    J Oral Biol (Northborough); 2022 Jun; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 36225716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Detection of the cemento-enamel junction with three different probes: an "in vitro" model.
    Barendregt DS; van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; Bulthuis HM; van der Weijden F
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 36(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 19196382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Errors in measuring parameters associated with periodontal health and disease.
    Kingman A; Löe H; Anerud A; Boysen H
    J Periodontol; 1991 Aug; 62(8):477-86. PubMed ID: 1920014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Reliability of attachment loss measurements in a longitudinal clinical trial.
    Best AM; Burmeister JA; Gunsolley JC; Brooks CN; Schenkein HA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1990 Sep; 17(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 2212086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Bone probing measurement as a reliable evaluation of the bone level in periodontal defects.
    Kim HY; Yi SW; Choi SH; Kim CK
    J Periodontol; 2000 May; 71(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 10872953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Comparisons of clinical and radiographic measurements of inter-proximal vertical defects before and 1 year after surgical treatments.
    Zybutz M; Rapoport D; Laurell L; Persson GR
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Mar; 27(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 10743864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Reproducibility of probing attachment level measurements.
    Badersten A; Nilvéus R; Egelberg J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Aug; 11(7):475-85. PubMed ID: 6589244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Intra-/inter-examiner reproducibility study of gingival bleeding.
    Van der Weijden GA; Timmerman MF; Saxton CA; Russell JI; Huntington E; Van der Velden U
    J Periodontal Res; 1994 Jul; 29(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 7932016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Manual periodontal probing in supportive periodontal treatment.
    Armitage GC
    Periodontol 2000; 1996 Oct; 12():33-9. PubMed ID: 9567991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.