These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8860028)

  • 1. Grey discoloration for the diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with class II amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Rudolphy MP; van Loveren C; van Amerongen JP
    Caries Res; 1996; 30(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 8860028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grey discolouration and marginal fracture for the diagnosis of secondary caries in molars with occlusal amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Rudolphy MP; van Amerongen JP; Penning C; ten Cate JM
    Caries Res; 1995; 29(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 8521439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of radiographs for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with class II amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Rudolphy MP; Gorter Y; van Loveren C; van Amerongen JP
    Caries Res; 1997; 31(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 8955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of bite-wings for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with occlusal amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Rudolphy MP; van Amerongen JP; Penning C; ten Cate JM
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 8402808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of proximal secondary caries at cervical class II-amalgam restoration margins in vitro.
    Neuhaus KW; Rodrigues JA; Seemann R; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2012 Jun; 40(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 22429927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnosis of secondary caries and crevices adjacent to amalgam.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Int Dent J; 1991 Dec; 41(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 1800386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
    Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of staining and marginal ditching as criteria for diagnosis of secondary caries around occlusal amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Magalhães CS; Freitas AB; Moreira AN; Ferreira EF
    Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20069254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical performance of DIAGnodent in the detection of secondary carious lesions.
    Bamzahim M; Aljehani A; Shi XQ
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Feb; 63(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 16095059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Progression of radiopacities and radiolucencies under amalgam restorations on bite-wing radiographs.
    Rudolphy MP; Gorter Y; van Loveren C; Poorterman JH; van Amerongen JP
    Caries Res; 1997; 31(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 8955989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Secondary caries around amalgam restorations.
    Pimenta LA; Navarro MF; Consolaro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Sep; 74(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 7473273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity and reliability of methods for the detection of secondary caries around amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
    Braga MM; Chiarotti AP; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 20339722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of several techniques for the detection of secondary caries adjacent to amalgam restorations.
    Ando M; González-Cabezas C; Isaacs RL; Eckert GJ; Stookey GK
    Caries Res; 2004; 38(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 15181334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Staining of residual caries under freshly-packed amalgam restorations exposed to tea/chlorhexidine in vitro.
    Kidd EA; Joyston-Bechal S; Smith MM
    Int Dent J; 1990 Aug; 40(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 2397953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The clinical diagnosis of occlusal caries: a problem.
    Weerheijm KL; van Amerongen WE; Eggink CO
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1989; 56(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 2723206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro assessment of the extent of caries under small occlusal cavities.
    van Amerongen JP; Penning C; Kidd EA; ten Cate JM
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 1521311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.