107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8860280)
61. Can an appointment-letter intervention increase pap smear screening in Samliem, Khon Kaen, Thailand?
Chumworathayi B; Yuenyao P; Luanratanakorn S; Pattamadilok J; Chalapati W; Na-Nhongkai C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(3):353-6. PubMed ID: 18159966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Understanding the barriers to cervical cancer screening among older women.
Van Til L; MacQuarrie C; Herbert R
Qual Health Res; 2003 Oct; 13(8):1116-31. PubMed ID: 14556422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Improving follow-up after an abnormal pap smear: results from a quasi-experimental intervention study.
Kaplan CP; Bastani R; Belin TR; Marcus A; Nasseri K; Hu MY
J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000 Sep; 9(7):779-90. PubMed ID: 11025870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. [Screening for uterine cervix cancer in Storstrøm, Vestsjaelland and Bornholm counties during 1979-1989].
Lynge E; Poll P; Larsen J; Schultz H; Thommesen N
Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1335-8. PubMed ID: 1598706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Pap smear screening in women 65 and older.
Wheat ME; Mandelblatt JS; Kunitz G
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1988 Sep; 36(9):827-30. PubMed ID: 3411068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Provision of general and HIV-specific health maintenance in middle aged and older patients in an urban HIV clinic.
Sheth AN; Moore RD; Gebo KA
AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2006 May; 20(5):318-25. PubMed ID: 16706706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. [The Nordic cervical screening programmes through 1995. Evaluation of incidence and mortality rates, targeted age groups and screening intervals.].
Sigurdsson K
Laeknabladid; 1999 Nov; 85(11):862-72. PubMed ID: 19439775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Is it relevant to screen women younger than 26 years for precancerous and malignant cervical lesions ?
Ghosh A; Rao S; Pramanik T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2005; 6(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 16101318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Effect of a community action intervention on cervical cancer screening rates in rural Australian towns: the CART project.
Hancock L; Sanson-Fisher R; Perkins J; Corkrey R; Burton R; Reid S
Prev Med; 2001 Feb; 32(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 11162336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Cervical cancer screening and registration--are they working?
Choyce A; McAvoy BR
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1990 Mar; 44(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 2348149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Incidence of cervical cancer after several negative smear results by age 50: prospective observational study.
Rebolj M; van Ballegooijen M; Lynge E; Looman C; Essink-Bot ML; Boer R; Habbema D
BMJ; 2009 Apr; 338():b1354. PubMed ID: 19395420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Cancer of the uterine cervix and screening of Aboriginal women.
Guest C; Mitchell H; Plant A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Aug; 30(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 2256865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Cervical cancer screening of women with schizophrenia in Taiwan.
Lin HC; Yang LY; Chiu WT
Psychiatr Serv; 2010 Mar; 61(3):327-8. PubMed ID: 20194418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Sensitivity of the screening program for cervical cancer in the Florence District.
Cecchini S; Piazzesi G; Carli S
Gynecol Oncol; 1989 May; 33(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 2649422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Pattern of cervical screening utilization in Italy.
Ferraroni M; La Vecchia C; Pagano R; Negri E; Parazzini F; Decarli A
Tumori; 1989 Oct; 75(5):420-2. PubMed ID: 2603219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. International incidence rates of invasive cervical cancer after introduction of cytological screening.
Gustafsson L; Pontén J; Zack M; Adami HO
Cancer Causes Control; 1997 Sep; 8(5):755-63. PubMed ID: 9328198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Process of care failures in invasive cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Spence AR; Goggin P; Franco EL
Prev Med; 2007; 45(2-3):93-106. PubMed ID: 17651792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in antenatal women.
Lavanya SV; Jogalakshmi D
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2002; 20(2):105-6. PubMed ID: 17657044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Exploring the barriers to cervical screening in an urban Canadian setting.
Fitch MI; Greenberg M; Cava M; Spaner D; Taylor K
Cancer Nurs; 1998 Dec; 21(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 9849002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Diagnosis of advanced cervical cancer, missed opportunities?
Mattern J; Letendre I; Sibiude J; Pénager C; Jnifen A; Souare F; Ayel S; Nguyen T; Mandelbrot L
BMC Womens Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):97. PubMed ID: 35354463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
