These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8861049)

  • 1. Uptake of cervical screening in general practice: effect of practice organisation, structure, and deprivation.
    Ibbotson T; Wyke S; McEwen J; Macintyre S; Kelly M
    J Med Screen; 1996; 3(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8861049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Costs and remuneration for cervical screening in general practice in the west of Scotland.
    Myles S; Wyke S; Ibbotson T; Macintyre S; McEwen J; Kelly M
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 1996 Oct; 1(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 10180874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do general practitioners influence the uptake of breast cancer screening?
    Majeed FA; Cook DG; Given-Wilson R; Vecchi P; Poloniecki J
    J Med Screen; 1995; 2(3):119-24. PubMed ID: 8536178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of practice and patient population characteristics on the uptake of childhood immunizations.
    Lynch M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Apr; 45(393):205-8. PubMed ID: 7612323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using patient and general practice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates.
    Majeed FA; Cook DG; Anderson HR; Hilton S; Bunn S; Stones C
    BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6939):1272-6. PubMed ID: 8205021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preliminary results of a district call scheme for cervical screening organised in general practice.
    Havelock CM; Webb J; Queenborough J
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6660):1384-6. PubMed ID: 3146374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical screening in Perth and Kinross since introduction of the new contract.
    Reid GS; Robertson AJ; Bissett C; Smith J; Waugh N; Halkerston R
    BMJ; 1991 Aug; 303(6800):447-50. PubMed ID: 1912838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uptake of screening for breast cancer in south Lancashire.
    Gatrell A; Garnett S; Rigby J; Maddocks A; Kirwan M
    Public Health; 1998 Sep; 112(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 9807924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. General practitioner based screening for cervical cancer: higher participation of women with a higher risk?
    Kant AC; Palm BT; Wentink E; van Weel C
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 9200061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting non-response to cervical cytology screening in Norfolk, England.
    Bentham G; Hinton J; Haynes R; Lovett A; Bestwick C
    Soc Sci Med; 1995 Jan; 40(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 7899917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. General practice factors and MMR vaccine uptake: structure, process and demography.
    Lamden KH; Gemmell I
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Sep; 30(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 18487248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The organization of cervical screening in general practice.
    Havelock C; Edwards R; Cuzick J; Chamberlain J
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 May; 38(310):207-11. PubMed ID: 3210183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical cytology screening and government policy.
    Ross SK
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6691):101-4. PubMed ID: 2504313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.
    Webb R; Richardson J; Pickles A
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 15333272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variance in practice emergency medical admission rates: can it be explained?
    Duffy R; Neville R; Staines H
    Br J Gen Pract; 2002 Jan; 52(474):14-7. PubMed ID: 11791810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial of invitation style.
    Gray M; Pennington CR
    Health Bull (Edinb); 2000 Mar; 58(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 12813842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical screening of Arabic-speaking women in Australian general practice.
    Lesjak M; Ward J; Rissel C
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 9275270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of socioeconomic deprivation on the primary care burden and treatment of patients with a diagnosis of heart failure in general practice in Scotland: population based study.
    McAlister FA; Murphy NF; Simpson CR; Stewart S; MacIntyre K; Kirkpatrick M; Chalmers J; Redpath A; Capewell S; McMurray JJ
    BMJ; 2004 May; 328(7448):1110. PubMed ID: 15107312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Did the London Initiative Zone investment programme affect general practice structure and performance in East London? A time series analysis of cervical screening coverage and asthma prescribing.
    Naish J; Eldridge S; Moser K; Sturdy P
    Public Health; 2002 Nov; 116(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12407476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geographical variations in the organisation of general practice.
    Gribben B; Bonita R; Broad J; McAvoy B; Raymont A
    N Z Med J; 1995 Sep; 108(1007):361-3. PubMed ID: 7566774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.