These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings. Mamassian P; Landy MS Vision Res; 1998 Sep; 38(18):2817-32. PubMed ID: 9775328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Local shape of pictorial relief. Koenderink J; van Doorn A; Wagemans J Iperception; 2014; 5(3):188-204. PubMed ID: 25469225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aging and the visual, haptic, and cross-modal perception of natural object shape. Norman JF; Crabtree CE; Norman HF; Moncrief BK; Herrmann M; Kapley N Perception; 2006; 35(10):1383-95. PubMed ID: 17214383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception of solid shape from shading. Mingolla E; Todd JT Biol Cybern; 1986; 53(3):137-51. PubMed ID: 3947683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning to perceive differences in solid shape through vision and touch. Norman JF; Clayton AM; Norman HF; Crabtree CE Perception; 2008; 37(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 18456923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Recognition of Solid Object Shape: The Importance of Inhomogeneity. Norman JF; Wheeler SP; Pedersen LE; Shain LM; Kinnard JD; Lenoir J Iperception; 2019; 10(4):2041669519870553. PubMed ID: 31448073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Smooth-shape assumption for perceiving shapes from shading. Sawada T; Kaneko H Perception; 2007; 36(3):403-15. PubMed ID: 17455755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aging preserves the ability to perceive 3D object shape from static but not deforming boundary contours. Norman JF; Bartholomew AN; Burton CL Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):198-207. PubMed ID: 18632085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reverse correlation reveals how observers sample visual information when estimating three-dimensional shape. Scarfe P; Hibbard PB Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 86():115-27. PubMed ID: 23665429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A dynamic object-processing network: metric shape discrimination of dynamic objects by activation of occipitotemporal, parietal, and frontal cortices. Schultz J; Chuang L; Vuong QC Cereb Cortex; 2008 Jun; 18(6):1302-13. PubMed ID: 17962220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The visual contour in depth. Koenderink JJ; van Doorn AJ; Kappers AM; Todd JT Percept Psychophys; 1997 Aug; 59(6):828-38. PubMed ID: 9270358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What stands out in a scene? A study of human explicit saliency judgment. Borji A; Sihite DN; Itti L Vision Res; 2013 Oct; 91():62-77. PubMed ID: 23954536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parts of visual form: psychophysical aspects. Siddiqi K; Tresness KJ; Kimia BB Perception; 1996; 25(4):399-424. PubMed ID: 8817619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frames of reference for the light-from-above prior in visual search and shape judgements. Adams WJ Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 17950264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of surface reflectance on local second order shape estimation in dynamic scenes. Dövencioğlu DN; Wijntjes MW; Ben-Shahar O; Doerschner K Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt B):218-30. PubMed ID: 25645965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shape from shading from images rendered with various surface types and light fields. Khang BG; Koenderink JJ; Kappers AM Perception; 2007; 36(8):1191-213. PubMed ID: 17972483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conveying shape with texture: experimental investigations of texture's effects on shape categorization judgments. Kim S; Hagh-Shenas H; Interrante V IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2004; 10(4):471-83. PubMed ID: 18579974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychophysics with junctions in real images. McDermott J Perception; 2004; 33(9):1101-27. PubMed ID: 15560510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]