These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8861993)
1. Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare? Cappelleri JC; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH; de Ferranti SD; Aubert M; Chalmers TC; Lau J JAMA; 1996 Oct 23-30; 276(16):1332-8. PubMed ID: 8861993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of large versus smaller randomized trials for mental health-related interventions. Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Gilbody SM; Trikalinos TA; Churchill R; Wahlbeck K; Ioannidis JP Am J Psychiatry; 2005 Mar; 162(3):578-84. PubMed ID: 15741476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution]. Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B; Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study. Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Issues in comparisons between meta-analyses and large trials. Ioannidis JP; Cappelleri JC; Lau J JAMA; 1998 Apr; 279(14):1089-93. PubMed ID: 9546568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical evaluation of very large treatment effects of medical interventions. Pereira TV; Horwitz RI; Ioannidis JP JAMA; 2012 Oct; 308(16):1676-84. PubMed ID: 23093165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? Als-Nielsen B; Chen W; Gluud C; Kjaergard LL JAMA; 2003 Aug; 290(7):921-8. PubMed ID: 12928469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects. Pereira TV; Ioannidis JP J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1060-9. PubMed ID: 21454050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses. Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials. Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta-analysis. Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H Stat Med; 2015 Jun; 34(13):2116-27. PubMed ID: 25809462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study. Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A finite mixture method for outlier detection and robustness in meta-analysis. Beath KJ Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 26052953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]