These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8861993)

  • 1. Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
    Cappelleri JC; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH; de Ferranti SD; Aubert M; Chalmers TC; Lau J
    JAMA; 1996 Oct 23-30; 276(16):1332-8. PubMed ID: 8861993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of large versus smaller randomized trials for mental health-related interventions.
    Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Gilbody SM; Trikalinos TA; Churchill R; Wahlbeck K; Ioannidis JP
    Am J Psychiatry; 2005 Mar; 162(3):578-84. PubMed ID: 15741476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.
    Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Issues in comparisons between meta-analyses and large trials.
    Ioannidis JP; Cappelleri JC; Lau J
    JAMA; 1998 Apr; 279(14):1089-93. PubMed ID: 9546568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical evaluation of very large treatment effects of medical interventions.
    Pereira TV; Horwitz RI; Ioannidis JP
    JAMA; 2012 Oct; 308(16):1676-84. PubMed ID: 23093165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?
    Als-Nielsen B; Chen W; Gluud C; Kjaergard LL
    JAMA; 2003 Aug; 290(7):921-8. PubMed ID: 12928469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects.
    Pereira TV; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1060-9. PubMed ID: 21454050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mega-trials vs. meta-analysis: precision vs. heterogeneity?
    Shrier I; Platt RW; Steele RJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 May; 28(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17188025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta-analysis.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Stat Med; 2015 Jun; 34(13):2116-27. PubMed ID: 25809462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study.
    Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A finite mixture method for outlier detection and robustness in meta-analysis.
    Beath KJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 26052953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials.
    Liebeskind DS; Kidwell CS; Sayre JW; Saver JL
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(6):973-9. PubMed ID: 17000963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials: an empirical example.
    Doi SA; Barendregt JJ; Mozurkewich EL
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Mar; 32(2):288-98. PubMed ID: 21147265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A generalized weighting regression-derived meta-analysis estimator robust to small-study effects and heterogeneity.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR; Ades AE; Abrams KR; Cooper NJ
    Stat Med; 2012 Jun; 31(14):1407-17. PubMed ID: 22351645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.