135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8862675)
1. Reproducibility of DNA ploidy and S-phase values from paraffin-embedded tissue.
Elavathil LJ; Celebre G; McFarlane D
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1996 Aug; 18(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 8862675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of flow and image cytometry for DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in breast carcinoma.
Chen TL; Luo I; Mikhail N; Rasková J; Raska K
Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 22(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 8556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of flow cytometric DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded solid neoplasms.
Kumar D; Kumar S; Lyon D
Mod Pathol; 1994 Apr; 7(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 8058708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interlaboratory reproducibility of semiautomated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometry DNA-histograms obtained from fresh material of 1,295 breast cancer cases.
Bergers E; Montironi R; van Diest PJ; Prete E; Baak JP
Hum Pathol; 1996 Jun; 27(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 8666364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cell cycle analysis of 932 flow cytometric DNA histograms of fresh frozen breast carcinoma material. Correlations between flow cytometric, clinical, and pathologic variables. MMMCP Collaborative Group. Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project Collaborative Group.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Cancer; 1996 Jun; 77(11):2258-66. PubMed ID: 8635093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of pepsin and trypsin digestion on paraffin-embedded tissue preparation for DNA flow cytometry.
Tagawa Y; Nakazaki T; Yasutake T; Matsuo S; Tomita M
Cytometry; 1993; 14(5):541-9. PubMed ID: 8354127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility in DNA flow cytometric analysis of breast cancer: comparison of 12 laboratories' results for 67 sample homogenates.
Baldetorp B; Bendahl PO; Fernö M; Alanen K; Delle U; Falkmer U; Hansson-Aggesjö B; Höckenström T; Lindgren A; Mossberg L
Cytometry; 1995 Jun; 22(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 7587742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic significance of DNA-ploidy and S-phase fraction in ovarian cancer determined by flow cytometry following detection of cytokeratin-labeled tumor cells.
Kimmig R; Wimberger P; Hillemanns P; Kapsner T; Caspari C; Hepp H
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Jan; 84(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 11748971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flow cytometric nuclear DNA content of fresh and paraffin-embedded tissues of breast carcinomas and fibroadenomas.
De Vita R; Calugi A; Eleuteri P; Maggi O; Nassuato C; Vecchione A
Eur J Basic Appl Histochem; 1991; 35(3):233-44. PubMed ID: 1718443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [MultiCycle software for cell cycle analyses].
Funai S; Kurooka K; Fujii Y; Inufusa H; Yamada H; Imanishi Y; Sato S; Shindo K; Yasutomi M
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1994 May; 21 Suppl 1():102-7. PubMed ID: 8203921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms of fresh breast cancer material.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jan; 8(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 7734408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An improved Hedley method for preparation of paraffin-embedded tissues for flow cytometric analysis of ploidy and S-phase.
Heiden T; Wang N; Tribukait B
Cytometry; 1991; 12(7):614-21. PubMed ID: 1723676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enzymatic treatments on paraffin blocks for DNA flow cytometry.
MacLeod CB; Repetti CF; Tsokos M
Mod Pathol; 1992 Sep; 5(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 1344822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in malignant serous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary.
Bakshi N; Rajwanshi A; Patel F; Ganguly NK
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1998 Jun; 20(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 9642449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of sonication on paraffin-embedded tissue preparation for DNA flow cytometry.
Gonchoroff NJ; Ryan JJ; Kimlinger TK; Witzig TE; Greipp PR; Meyer JS; Katzmann JA
Cytometry; 1990; 11(5):642-6. PubMed ID: 2379456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA ploidy by image cytometry in urothelial carcinomas. Comparison of touch imprints and paraffin-embedded biopsies from 31 patients.
Mainguené C; Choquenet C; Deplano C; Gavelli A; Clément N; Vanzo E; Hofman P
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Oct; 19(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 9349904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of fresh and paraffin-embedded tissue as starting material for DNA flow cytometry and evaluation of intratumor heterogeneity.
Kallioniemi OP
Cytometry; 1988 Mar; 9(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 3359893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Correlation of DNA index and S-phase fraction with histopathologic grade and clinical outcome.
Demirel D; Laucirica R; Fishman A; Owens RG; Grey MM; Kaplan AL; Ramzy I
Cancer; 1996 Apr; 77(8):1494-500. PubMed ID: 8608534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flow and image cytometric DNA ploidy, including 5c exceeding cells, of serous borderline malignant ovarian tumors. Correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics.
Flezar MS; But I; Kavalar R; Us-Krasovec M
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2003 Jun; 25(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 12882085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of five cell cycle analysis models applied to 1414 flow cytometric DNA histograms of fresh frozen breast cancer.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Cytometry; 1997 Feb; 30(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 9056743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
