These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 886274)

  • 1. Attention and visual dominance: a chronometric analysis.
    Klein RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1977 Aug; 3(3):365-78. PubMed ID: 886274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention and visual dominance in motor learning.
    Tloczynski J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Apr; 76(2):655-66. PubMed ID: 8483684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Existence of competing modality dominances.
    Robinson CW; Chandra M; Sinnett S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1104-14. PubMed ID: 26832916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of endogenous and exogenous orientations of attention on inhibition of return in a cross-modal target-target aiming task.
    Lyons J; Glazebrook CM; Keetch KM; Dhillon VP; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2006 May; 38(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16709561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Sturm W; Willmes K; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():67-76. PubMed ID: 25577489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli?
    Van Damme S; Crombez G; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 193(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 18953530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamics of alpha suppression index both modality specific and general attention processes.
    Clements GM; Gyurkovics M; Low KA; Kramer AF; Beck DM; Fabiani M; Gratton G
    Neuroimage; 2023 Apr; 270():119956. PubMed ID: 36863549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re-evaluating visual and auditory dominance through modality switching costs and congruency analyses.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jun; 140(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 22622231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When kinesthetic information is neglected in learning a Novel bimanual rhythmic coordination.
    Zhu Q; Mirich T; Huang S; Snapp-Childs W; Bingham GP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1830-1840. PubMed ID: 28508115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17333012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual dominance in the cross-modal kinesthetic to kinesthetic plus visual feedback condition.
    Reeve TG; Mackey LJ; Fober GW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Feb; 62(1):243-52. PubMed ID: 3960666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):935-943. PubMed ID: 26377338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vision and kinesthesis in spatial short-term memory.
    Podros LZ; Wyke MA; Waters JM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Oct; 53(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 7312531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effector-specific visual information influences kinesthesis and reaction time performance in Parkinson's disease.
    Byblow WD; Lewis GN; Stinear JW
    J Mot Behav; 2003 Jun; 35(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12711581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of visual vs kinesthetic instruction for learning a gross motor skill.
    Mount J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Dec; 65(3):715-20. PubMed ID: 3438116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.