These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 886281)

  • 1. Influence of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized light stimuli.
    Berlucchi G; Crea F; Di Stefano M; Tassinari G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1977 Aug; 3(3):505-17. PubMed ID: 886281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position.
    Matsumoto E; Misaki M; Miyauchi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Spatial stimulus-response compatibility: presentation of stimuli within one visual hemifield].
    Nicoletti R; Anzola GP; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1980 Jul; 56(13):1426-31. PubMed ID: 7448039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Iacoboni M; Woods RP; Mazziotta JC
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):321-31. PubMed ID: 8836228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space.
    Bächtold D; Baumüller M; Brugger P
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Aug; 36(8):731-5. PubMed ID: 9751438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline.
    Nicoletti R; Anzola GP; Luppino G; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Oct; 8(5):664-73. PubMed ID: 6218228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Study of simple reaction time to lateralized visual stimuli].
    Borutti G; Cosi V; Magrotti E; Cerutti G
    Riv Neurol; 1980; 50(3):193-211. PubMed ID: 7466216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reaction times to lateralized visual stimuli in callosal agenesis: stimulus and response factors.
    Milner AD; Jeeves MA; Silver PH; Lines CR; Wilson J
    Neuropsychologia; 1985; 23(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 4022301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Reaction time and interhemispheric interaction].
    Kostandov EA; Zakharova NN; Pogrebinskiĭ SA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1978; 28(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 636652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Possible recoding of visual space in covert orienting tasks.
    Berlucchi G; Aglioti S; Chelazzi L; Peru A; Tassinari G
    Arch Ital Biol; 1999 May; 137(2-3):127-37. PubMed ID: 10349491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of flunitrazepam on responses to lateralized visual stimuli: evidence for cerebral asymmetry of execution of manual movements to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space.
    Ingum J; Bjørklund R
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1994 May; 114(4):551-8. PubMed ID: 7855216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemispheric sensitivity to body stimuli in simple reaction time.
    Aziz-Zadeh L; Iacoboni M; Zaidel E
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 170(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 16328286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual and tactile interhemispheric transfer compared with the method of Poffenberger.
    Fendrich R; Hutsler JJ; Gazzaniga MS
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 15054567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visuo-spatial neural response interactions in early cortical processing during a simple reaction time task: a high-density electrical mapping study.
    Murray MM; Foxe JJ; Higgins BA; Javitt DC; Schroeder CE
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(8):828-44. PubMed ID: 11369406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right hemispheric contribution to motor programming of simultaneous bilateral response.
    Taniguchi Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 2):1283-90. PubMed ID: 10485112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility in callosotomy patients and subjects with callosal agenesis.
    Aglioti S; Tassinari G; Berlucchi G
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 1996; 20(4):623-9. PubMed ID: 8994201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm).
    Braun CM; Larocque C; Achim A
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 157(4):442-56. PubMed ID: 15292975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic stimulation and the crossed-uncrossed difference (CUD) paradigm: selective effects in the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres.
    Chiang TC; Lavidor M
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(3):404-8. PubMed ID: 15645228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 24337351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.