These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8863148)

  • 1. Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants.
    Corbett F; Oldham J; Lilford R
    J Med Ethics; 1996 Aug; 22(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 8863148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials.
    Robinson EJ; Kerr CE; Stevens AJ; Lilford RJ; Braunholtz DA; Edwards SJ; Beck SR; Rowley MG
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(8):1-192, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15763039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials.
    Daugherty CK; Ratain MJ; Minami H; Banik DM; Vogelzang NJ; Stadler WM; Siegler M
    J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jul; 16(7):2305-12. PubMed ID: 9667244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trial participants' self-reported understanding of randomisation phrases in participation information leaflets can be high, but acceptability of some descriptions is low, especially those linked to gambling and luck.
    Shiely F; Murphy E; Gilles K; Hood K; O'Sullivan L; Harman N; Isaacs T; Treweek S
    Trials; 2024 Jun; 25(1):391. PubMed ID: 38890748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials.
    Ryan RE; Prictor MJ; McLaughlin KJ; Hill SJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jan; (1):CD003717. PubMed ID: 18254029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethics of clinical research: lessons for the future.
    Baum M; Zilkha K; Houghton J
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6693):251-3. PubMed ID: 2504385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can the written information to research subjects be improved?--an empirical study.
    Bjørn E; Rossel P; Holm S
    J Med Ethics; 1999 Jun; 25(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 10390684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informed consent in European multicentre randomised clinical trials--are patients really informed?
    Williams CJ; Zwitter M
    Eur J Cancer; 1994; 30A(7):907-10. PubMed ID: 7946580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed consent.
    Hooker EZ
    SCI Nurs; 1992 Aug; 9(3):86-91. PubMed ID: 1519042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable?
    Kerr C; Robinson E; Stevens A; Braunholtz D; Edwards S; Lilford R
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Feb; 30(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 14872081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials.
    Robinson EJ; Kerr C; Stevens A; Lilford R; Braunholtz D; Edwards S
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Feb; 58(4):811-24. PubMed ID: 14672595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.
    Jefford M; Moore R
    Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):485-93. PubMed ID: 18452859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The myth of informed consent: in daily practice and in clinical trials.
    Silverman WA
    J Med Ethics; 1989 Mar; 15(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 2926788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical considerations.
    Treiman DM
    Epilepsy Res Suppl; 1993; 10():137-48. PubMed ID: 8251089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Pre-randomisation in study designs: getting past the taboo].
    Schellings R; Kessels AG; Sturmans F
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2053-6. PubMed ID: 18837179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective.
    Daugherty CK
    J Clin Oncol; 1999 May; 17(5):1601-17. PubMed ID: 10334550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial.
    Featherstone K; Donovan JL
    BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7167):1177-80. PubMed ID: 9794849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding preferences regarding consent for pragmatic trials in acute care.
    Dickert NW; Wendler D; Devireddy CM; Goldkind SF; Ko YA; Speight CD; Kim SY
    Clin Trials; 2018 Dec; 15(6):567-578. PubMed ID: 30280582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On informed consent.
    Lara MC; de la Fuente JR
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1990; 24(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 2073557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of consent form information on self-disclosure.
    Sigmon ST; Rohan KJ; Dorhofer D; Hotovy LA; Trask PC; Boulard N
    Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(4):299-310. PubMed ID: 11655336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.