These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8864971)

  • 1. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome.
    Harrison DD; Troyanovich SJ; Harrison DE; Janik TJ; Murphy DJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996; 19(6):398-405. PubMed ID: 8864971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome.
    Cooperstein R
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 Feb; 20(2):136-7; author reply 137-9. PubMed ID: 9046464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome.
    Jutkowitz J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 May; 20(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 9168416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: rationale for treatment beyond the resolution of symptoms.
    Troyanovich SJ; Harrison DE; Harrison DD
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Jan; 21(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 9467100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the assumptions used to derive an ideal normal cervical spine model.
    Harrison DD; Janik TJ; Troyanovich SJ; Harrison DE; Colloca CJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 May; 20(4):246-56. PubMed ID: 9168409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome.
    Morgan L
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 Feb; 20(2):130-1; author reply 131-3. PubMed ID: 9046462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The curve of the cervical spine: variations and significance.
    Homulka MF
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Jun; 17(5):347. PubMed ID: 7930970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty.
    Suk KS; Kim KT; Lee JH; Lee SH; Lim YJ; Kim JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):E656-60. PubMed ID: 17978640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The curve of the cervical spine: variations and significance.
    Gay RE
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1993; 16(9):591-4. PubMed ID: 8133194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome.
    Jutkowitz J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Jan; 21(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 9467103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do sagittal plane anatomical variations (angulation) of the cervical facets and C2 odontoid affect the geometrical configuration of the cervical lordosis?
    Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Haas JW; Janik TJ; Holland B
    Clin Anat; 2005 Mar; 18(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 15696531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kyphoplasty reduction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: correction of local kyphosis versus overall sagittal alignment.
    Pradhan BB; Bae HW; Kropf MA; Patel VV; Delamarter RB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 16481954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A normal spinal position: It's time to accept the evidence.
    Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Troyanovich SJ; Harmon S
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000; 23(9):623-44. PubMed ID: 11145804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the effect of chiropractic manipulative therapy on hypolordosis of the cervical spine.
    Leach RA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1983 Mar; 6(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 6854156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of halo-vest components on stabilizing the injured cervical spine.
    Ivancic PC; Beauchman NN; Tweardy L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 19139667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional spinal coupling mechanics: Part I. A review of the literature.
    Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Troyanovich SJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Feb; 21(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 9502066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical features and strategies for treatment of spinal fracture complicating ankylosing spondylitis].
    Qian BP; Qiu Y; Wang B; Yu Y; Zhu ZZ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 87(41):2893-8. PubMed ID: 18261302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lateral mass screw-rod fixation of the cervical spine: a prospective clinical series with 1-year follow-up.
    Deen HG; Birch BD; Wharen RE; Reimer R
    Spine J; 2003; 3(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 14609694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kinematic analysis of the relationship between sagittal alignment and disc degeneration in the cervical spine.
    Miyazaki M; Hymanson HJ; Morishita Y; He W; Zhang H; Wu G; Kong MH; Tsumura H; Wang JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E870-6. PubMed ID: 18978580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.