These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8865299)

  • 1. Is judging time-to-contact based on 'tau'?
    Smeets JB; Brenner E; Trébuchet S; Mestre DR
    Perception; 1996; 25(5):583-90. PubMed ID: 8865299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Duration, distance, and speed judgments of two moving objects by 4- to 11-year olds.
    Matsuda F
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Nov; 63(2):286-311. PubMed ID: 8923748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity.
    Smeets JB; Brenner E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Feb; 21(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 7707030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The shape of the scene background determines the perceived path of a moving object.
    Zhang J; Braunstein ML; Andersen GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2117-23. PubMed ID: 25181369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Things that go bump in the light: on the optical specification of contact severity.
    Kaiser MK; Phatak AV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Feb; 19(1):194-202. PubMed ID: 8440985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact.
    Tresilian JR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):865-76. PubMed ID: 1834797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual determinants of a cross-modal illusion.
    Armontrout JA; Schutz M; Kubovy M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1618-27. PubMed ID: 19801621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Global and local contributions to the optical specification of time to contact: observer sensitivity to composite tau.
    Bootsma RJ; Craig CM
    Perception; 2002; 31(8):901-24. PubMed ID: 12269586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual impressions of pushing and pulling: the object perceived as causal is not always the one that moves first.
    White PA
    Perception; 2012; 41(10):1193-217. PubMed ID: 23469701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of task-irrelevant texture motion on time-to-contact judgments.
    Oberfeld D; Hecht H; Landwehr K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):581-96. PubMed ID: 21264724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of uncertainty in the systematic spatial mislocalization of moving objects.
    Brenner E; van Beers RJ; Rotman G; Smeets JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):811-25. PubMed ID: 16846281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time-to-passage judgments on circular trajectories are based on relative optical acceleration.
    Kerzel D; Hecht H; Kim NG
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Oct; 63(7):1153-70. PubMed ID: 11766941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual localization and estimation of extent of target motion during ocular pursuit: a common mechanism?
    Mateeff S; Hohnsbein J; Ehrenstein WH
    Perception; 1990; 19(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 2096364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The spatiotemporal distinctiveness of direct causation.
    Young ME; Sutherland S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Aug; 16(4):729-35. PubMed ID: 19648460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Saccades reveal that allocentric coding of the moving object causes mislocalization in the flash-lag effect.
    Becker SI; Ansorge U; Turatto M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1313-24. PubMed ID: 19633347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple sources of information and time-to-contact judgments.
    Kim NG; Grocki MJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1946-58. PubMed ID: 16469351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prehension movements directed to approaching objects: influence of stimulus velocity on the transport and the grasp components.
    Chieffi S; Fogassi L; Gallese V; Gentilucci M
    Neuropsychologia; 1992 Oct; 30(10):877-97. PubMed ID: 1436435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli.
    Fouriezos G; Capstick G; Monette F; Bellemare C; Parkinson M; Dumoulin A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 18266504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optical information about the severity of upcoming contacts.
    Kim NG; Turvey MT; Carello C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Feb; 19(1):179-93. PubMed ID: 8440984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anticipating arrival: is the tau margin a specious theory?
    Wann JP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Aug; 22(4):1031-48. PubMed ID: 8830110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.