181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8865609)
1. A prototype effect and categorization of artificial polymorphous stimuli in pigeons.
Jitsumori M
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1996 Oct; 22(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 8865609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia).
Makino H; Jitsumori M
J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 17324072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pigeons see correspondence between objects and their pictures.
Spetch ML; Friedman A
Psychol Sci; 2006 Nov; 17(11):966-72. PubMed ID: 17176429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of stimulus manipulations on visual categorization in pigeons.
Lazareva OF; Freiburger KL; Wasserman EA
Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 16616817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Same-different texture discrimination in pigeons: testing competing models of discrimination and stimulus integration.
Cook RG; Wixted JT
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1997 Oct; 23(4):401-16. PubMed ID: 9411017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transfer across delayed discriminations: evidence regarding the nature of prospective working memory.
Urcuioli PJ; Zentall TR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Apr; 18(2):154-73. PubMed ID: 1583445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pigeon perception and discrimination of rapidly changing texture stimuli.
Cook RG; Cavoto BR; Katz JS; Cavoto KK
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1997 Oct; 23(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 9335133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Target-defining features in a "people-present/people-absent" discrimination task by pigeons.
Aust U; Huber L
Anim Learn Behav; 2002 May; 30(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 12141137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrimination of artificial polymorphous categories by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Jitsumori M
Q J Exp Psychol B; 1994 Nov; 47(4):371-86. PubMed ID: 7809403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Control of choice in conditional discriminations by sample-specific behaviors.
Urcuioli PJ; Honig WK
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Jul; 6(3):251-77. PubMed ID: 7391752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Categorical shape and color coding by pigeons.
Zentall TR; Jackson-Smith P; Jagielo JA; Nallan GB
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Apr; 12(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 3701264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).
Wills AJ; Lea SE; Leaver LA; Osthaus B; Ryan CM; Suret MB; Bryant CM; Chapman SJ; Millar L
J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recognition of static and dynamic images of depth-rotated human faces by pigeons.
Jitsumori M; Makino H
Learn Behav; 2004 May; 32(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 15281387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new approach to the formation of equivalence classes in pigeons.
Jitsumori M; Siemann M; Lehr M; Delius JD
J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 12507011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pigeons discriminate continuous versus discontinuous line segments.
Kirkpatrick K; Wilkinson A; Johnston S
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jul; 33(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 17620026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes.
Cook RG; Katz JS; Cavoto BR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1997 Oct; 23(4):417-33. PubMed ID: 9411018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pigeons can learn to make visual category discriminations using either low or high spatial frequency information.
Lea SE; Poser-Richet V; Meier C
Behav Processes; 2015 Mar; 112():81-7. PubMed ID: 25447512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Degree of representation of the matching concept in pigeons (Columba livia).
Colombo M; Cottle A; Frost N
J Comp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 117(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 14498800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elemental versus configural perception in a people-present/people-absent discrimination task by pigeons.
Aust U; Huber L
Learn Behav; 2003 Aug; 31(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 14577546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transfer to intermediate forms following concept discrimination by pigeons: chimeras and morphs.
Ghosh N; Lea SE; Noury M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 15540501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
