These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8865631)

  • 21. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1460-70. PubMed ID: 10738801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
    Hauser R; Probst R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Veuillet E; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1.
    Mauermann M; Uppenkamp S; van Hengel PW; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3473-83. PubMed ID: 10615687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Mice Above and Below the Eliciting Primaries.
    Cheatham MA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Aug; 24(4):413-428. PubMed ID: 37464091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability.
    Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Nov; 92(5):2662-82. PubMed ID: 1479129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visualization of the onset of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, and measurement of their latency.
    Whitehead ML; Stagner BB; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1663-79. PubMed ID: 8817893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characteristics of the acoustic distortion product 2f2-f1 from the normal human ear.
    Erminy M; Avan P; Bonfils P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1998 Jan; 118(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 9504160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simultaneous latency estimations for distortion product otoacoustic emissions and envelope following responses.
    Purcell DW; Van Roon P; John MS; Picton TW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2869-80. PubMed ID: 16708945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space.
    Whitehead ML; Stagner BB; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2359-77. PubMed ID: 7714255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for the assessment of auditory sensitivity].
    Chida E
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1998 Nov; 101(11):1335-47. PubMed ID: 9867000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.
    Robles L; Ruggero MA; Rich NC
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 77(5):2385-99. PubMed ID: 9163365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Group delays of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: relating delays measured with f1- and f2-sweep paradigms.
    Prijs VF; Schneider S; Schoonhoven R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3298-307. PubMed ID: 10875375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Origin of the bell-like dependence of the DPOAE amplitude on primary frequency ratio.
    Lukashkin AN; Russell IJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):3097-106. PubMed ID: 11785811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Suppression of the 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Harris FP; Probst R; Xu L
    Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 64(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 1490896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters.
    Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1587-607. PubMed ID: 1564196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ["Single generator distortion products"(sgDPOAE). Precise measurements of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by three-tone stimulations].
    Plinkert PK; Heitmann J; Waldmann B
    HNO; 1997 Nov; 45(11):909-14. PubMed ID: 9476103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.